What would Alister Think?

This search link at the Digital Library of the Caribbean/Caribbean Newspaper Digital Library <http://dloc.com/results/table/?text=%22eric+gairy%22+%22grenada+newsletter%22> shows 136 references to “Eric Gairy” in the Grenada Newsletter (published 1974 to 1992 by Cynthia and Alister Hughes in St. George’s), in case anyone wonders, as I did, what dear departed Alister might have to say about renaming the Botanic Garden after the first Prime Minister . . . . . or leader of the Mongoose Gang, if you will. . . . [A search on “Eric Gairy”and “mongoose” in the 477 editions of the Grenada Newsletter catalogued at the DLoC shows 33 hits — perhaps it would be more appropriate to rename the zoological garden rather than the Botanical Gardens?]

from the CaribJournal <http://www.caribjournal.com/2014/04/16/grenada-to-rename-botanical-gardens-for-first-prime-minister/>

Grenada to Rename Botanical Gardens For First Prime Minister

April 16, 2014 | 11:39 am | Print

Grenada to Rename Botanical Gardens For First Prime Minister


Above: the Botanical Gardens in Grenada

By the Caribbean Journal staff

Grenada will be renaming its Botanical Gardens after the country’s first Prime Minister, Sir Eric Matthew Gairy, according to the government.

Social Development Minister Delma Thomas said a team would soon begin upgrades to the gardens as part of the project.

“We will have a group of volunteers, international volunteers, who will be joining our local persons, students from TAMCC, in helping to revitalize the whole area to make it an attractive site as we recognize the tremendous contribution that Sir Eric Mathew Gairy made to Grenada,” Thomas said following a Cabinet briefing on Tuesday.

In a statement, the government said the renaming was part of a government initiative to honour Gairy.

“Our father of independence, he was our first prime Minister and he has done a lot for our country and we must recognize what he has done,” Thomas said.

Gairy served as Prime Minister of Grenada from 1974 until 1979, when he was overthrown by a coup.

Bruce
bpotter

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Five-Meter Shark Tagged off Western Australia

A Series of Articles from Western Australia (WA) about [Great White] Sharks
from Australia Broadcasting. . . <http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-15/swimmes-warned-after-great-white-spotted-off-south-west-coast/5392236>

Massive great white shark attracted to whale carcass on WA beach prompts warning to swimmers

Updated 2 hours 33 minutes ago

An image of one of the biggest great white sharks ever tagged has sparked a flurry of online interest and a fresh warning to swimmers off WA’s south coast.

The 5.04-metre shark, the largest ever fitted with an internal acoustic tag off the Australian coast, was detected near Albany at the weekend when a distressed whale beached itself.

The City of Albany closed beaches on Saturday and the carcass was removed, but the massive shark is believed to have remained in the area.

The shark was fitted with an internal tag last month when it was swimming near Mistaken Island off the Albany coast.

Department of Fisheries officers hooked the great white and flipped it onto its back near the side of their boat.

The department’s Mark Kleeman said a photo taken during the procedure shows the shark in a state of temporary paralysis known as “tonic immobility”.

“In a sense the shark basically goes to sleep, which enables our technical officers to do a small surgical procedure to implant an acoustic tag inside the shark’s gut cavity,” he said.

At the time it was taken the Fisheries officer was completing the final stitches to the female shark’s belly as it lay docile in the water.

Mr Kleeman said the shark woke up as soon as it was flipped over.

 

“It was an impressive feat,” he said.

“In this instance the shark came pretty much instantaneous back to life.

“All the ropes and the equipment used to secure the animal has quick release clips on it, so she was quickly released so she swam off very strongly.”

He said the tag – the second to be attached to the animal – would allow it to be monitored for the next 10 years.

The giant great white has been detected periodically near Albany since it was tagged.

It was last detected at Ellen Cove, near one of the city’s popular swimming beaches, at 5:44am (AWST) today.

Mr Kleeman said swimmers near Albany should be cautious for the next few days.

“Obviously with that whale incidence and the distress signals that would have sent out, it would have attracted sharks and they will probably frequent the beach on and off for the next few days,” he added.

WA seeking to extend catch-and-kill program

Western Australia currently has a catch-and-kill policy for great white, tiger and bull sharks larger than three metres that come close to certain beaches.

The State Government recently moved to extend federal approval for the divisive program for another three years.

Fatal shark attacks in WA since 2000

  • Surfer Chris Boyd: Gracetown, Nov 23, 2013
  • Surfer Ben Linden: Wedge Island, July 14, 2012
  • Diver Peter Kurmann: Geographe Bay, March 31, 2012
  • Diver George Wainwright: Rottnest Island, Oct 22, 2011
  • Swimmer Bryn Martin: Cottesloe Beach, Oct 10, 2011
  • Surfer Kyle Burden: Bunker Bay, Sept 4, 2011
  • Surfer Nick Edwards: Gracetown, Aug 17, 2010
  • Snorkeler Brian Guest: Port Kennedy, Dec 27, 2008
  • Snorkeler Geoffrey Brazier: Abrolhos Islands, Mar 18, 2005
  • Surfer Brad Smith: Gracetown, July 10, 2004
  • Swimmer Ken Crew: North Cottesloe, Nov 6, 2000

WA introduced the policy of setting baited drum lines off five Perth beaches and two in the south-west following an increase in fatal shark attacks in the past 10 years.

Albany does not have baited drum lines off the coast.

Federal approval for the policy only lasts for three more weeks and in order to be extended, the program will have to face a full environmental assessment under Commonwealth law.

Under the proposal, the WA Government would set up to 60 baited drum lines off metropolitan and south-west beaches from November 15 to April 30 each year.

Another 12 would be held in reserve to be deployed when sharks over three metres come close to WA beaches.

Lines would not be set in any proposed marine sanctuary zone, gazetted or proposed recreation zone in any Western Australian marine park or designated fish habitat protection area.

Since the program’s inception the Government has been forced to fend off countless protests and a Supreme Court legal challenge.

Shark policy remains controversial

In March, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) ruled out assessing Western Australia’s controversial shark cull, saying it posed a negligible risk to the species.

The decision to cull has been controversial and there have been a number of public protests.

The EPA was called on to assess the policy and rule whether it was environmentally acceptable.

It received 23,000 submissions during a public consultation, which ended in February.

In March, Sea Shepherd failed to get a Supreme Court order to stop the cull.

It had argued the catch-and-kill policy had been improperly introduced, but the Supreme Court ruled the introduction of the drum lines was valid.

 

[The banner at the top of the Potter’s Weal blog <Pottersweal period com> is Muriwai Beach on North Island, New Zealand, where a beach guard was killed the week before by three sharks. Beware big fish in the antipodes. BP]

Posted in Beaches | Leave a comment

Increased Power Outages . . .

Report: Power outages due to weather have doubled since 2003

From the Washington Post’s “Weather Gang:”

(Climate Central)

(Climate Central)

Climate Central released a report Thursday with a remarkable conclusion, but one that may not surprise too frequently “in the dark” Washington, D.C.-area residents: the number of weather-related power outages has shot up since the 1980s, and doubled since 2003.

The Princeton, NJ-based non-profit conducted a national analysis of the last 28 years of outage data from U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, and from the North American Electric Reliability Council. It found a stunning ten-fold increase in outages over the period, spanning 1984-2012.

Some of the increase since the 1980s is due to increased outage reporting, Climate Central cautions. ”Yet even since 2003, after stricter reporting requirements were widely implemented, the average annual number of weather-related power outages doubled,” the report finds.

(Climate Central)

(Climate Central)

Virginia and Maryland were both among the ten states with the most weather-related outages since 2003, ranking 5th and 6th, respectively. In that time span, the region was rocked by Hurricanes Isabel (2003), Irene (2011), and Sandy (2012), the June 2012 derecho, and Snowmageddon (2010), all mass-outage events.

Four power companies which serve the Washington, D.C. region (Dominion, Pepco, Baltimore Gas and Electric, and Allegheny) were among the top 25 utilities with the most reported major weather-related outages from 2003-2012, nationally.

The surge in outages raises the question: what’s the cause of the uptick?

Climate Central explains many factors may be driving the increase – from a vulnerable grid under heavy demand to an apparent increase in extreme weather events, some of which may be linked to human-induced climate change. It describes climate change as an outage “threat multiplier” but cautions linking certain extreme weather events to climate change is difficult.

“Climate change is, at most, partially responsible for this recent increase in major power outages, which is a product of an aging grid serving greater electricity demand, and an increase in storms and extreme weather events that damage this system,” the report concludes. “But a warming planet provides more fuel for increasingly intense and violent storms, heat waves, and wildfires, which in turn will continue to strain, and too often breach, our highly vulnerable electrical infrastructure.”

The full report is worth a read: BLACKOUT: EXTREME WEATHER, CLIMATE CHANGE AND POWER OUTAGES

Jason Samenow

Jason Samenow is the Capital Weather Gang’s chief meteorologist and serves as the Washington Post’s Weather Editor. He earned BA and MS degrees in atmospheric science from the University of Virginia and University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Commonwealth Small Islands Agree . . . (annotated version of Jamaica Observer article)

From the Jamaica Observer of 31 March 2014 <http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Commonwealth-countries-agree-on-way-forward_16377957>

Commonwealth countries agree on way forward

Monday, March 31, 2014

Print this page Email A Friend!

St Lucian Prime Minister Dr Kenny Anthony

CASTRIES, St Lucia (CMC) — Commonwealth countries have ended a two-day meeting here, identifying key “vulnerable” priority areas geared at building resilience and sustainability in small developing states.

Delegates attending the third Biennial Conference on Small States agreed to maintain their approach to get the international community to pay more attention to the challenges faced by their nations.

With the Commonwealth’s five key pillars of resilience — building of macro-economic stability; micro-economic market efficiency; good governance; social development and cohesion; and sound environmental management as the backbone of their strategy — the meeting has adopted a blueprint for finalising a framework towards building resilience.

The meeting “emphasised the conceptual underpinnings of vulnerability and resilience in each of the five pillars and the use of resilience profiling to drive progress forward”.

The Commonwealth said a critical component of the framework is the forging of strong partnerships in order to acquire much needed global financing and a better trade environment.

“The issues that were discussed over that last two days will be used to feed into the G20* development forum which the Commonwealth plays an important technical role,” said Commonwealth Deputy Secretary General, Deodat Maharaj.

“What is valuable of that forum is that we also have other important partners — not only the G20 countries but also institutions such as the World Bank. As a matter of fact on the issues that we discussed here one key issue was how do you deal with shocks associated with natural disasters,” he said.

The Commonwealth says it plans to lobby other small states ahead of the Small Island Developing States (SIDS) conference to be held in Samoa later this year in order to get support for the use of a “vulnerability index”.

“One of the key deliverables therefore that we are seeking following the conference and for the Small Island Developing States conference taking place in Samoa will be the finalisation of the resilience index which can better help small island developing states to access concessional and development financing,” said Seychelles Foreign Affairs Minister Jean-Paul Adam.

“One of the key concerns that have been raised for example is debt and the debt overhang that many island countries have and it’s a question of finding innovative ways to address these issues,” Adam.

Other deliverables included the “innovative and non-traditional measures to address high debt burdens; the inclusion of vulnerability as a criteria for access to concessional resources; the development and application of counter-cyclical loans for mitigation of growth and debt challenges as well as a debt for climate change adaptation and mitigation swaps“.

Adam and his St Lucia counterpart, Alva Baptiste said that the 53-member** grouping now has a six-month timeline to get the “vulnerability index”, which is a concept already in progress by the Commonwealth ready for the September SIDS meeting.

“So when we have developed that vulnerability index it gives us a better chance of now attracting concessionary financing so that we can reduce our debt, get the opportunity to have more room to manoeuvre and fiscal flexibility that we can now stimulate more employment for the people of the country, deal with poverty in a more decisive way,” Baptiste said.

He told reporters, “As you reduce poverty and unemployment, a greater number of your citizens will now have access to finance, so that they can make an effective demand for goods and services in the economy. And so it will contribute to growth and the well-being of the people of the perspective jurisdictions.”

The link between governance and resilience was also discussed with delegates exploring options for policymakers to strengthen their governance framework, given their limited human and financial resources.

On the issue of climate change, delegates highlighted the need for ocean forecasting to predict impacts from climate change. They also called for action on land-based sources of pollution as well as concrete efforts to strengthen oceans and seas issues.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

*G20 Members: Countries

  • Argentina
  • Australia
  • Brazil
  • Canada
  • China
  • France
  • Germany
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Mexico
  • Russia
  • Saudi Arabia
  • South Africa
  • Korea
  • Turkey
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • European Union

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

**Can’t find the 53rd SID, but here’s Wikipedia’s list of 52 SIDS, with collateral memberships noted in footnotes:

Caribbean Pacific Africa, Indian Ocean, Mediterranean and South China Sea (AIMS)
Anguilla[a][b][c] American Samoa[d][e][c] Bahrain[a][e]
Antigua and Barbuda Cook Islands[c] Cape Verde[e]
Aruba[a][f] Federated States of Micronesia Comoros[g]
Bahamas Fiji Guinea-Bissau[g][e]
Barbados French Polynesia[a][b][c] Maldives[f]
Belize Guam[d][e][c] Mauritius
British Virgin Islands[a][b][c] Kiribati[g] São Tomé and Príncipe[g][e]
Cuba[e] Marshall Islands Seychelles
Dominica Nauru Singapore[e]
Dominican Republic[f] New Caledonia[a][b][c]
Grenada Niue[c]
Guyana Northern Mariana Islands[a][e][c]
Haiti[g] Palau
Jamaica Papua New Guinea
Montserrat[a][c] Samoa[g]
Netherlands Antilles[d][f][c] Solomon Islands[g]
Puerto Rico[a][f][c] Timor-Leste[g][a][f]
Saint Kitts and Nevis Tonga
Saint Lucia Tuvalu[g]
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Vanuatu[g]
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
United States Virgin Islands[d][e][c]

Notes (a = 1, b = 2, etc.)

  1. Neither member nor observer of the Alliance of Small Island States
  2. Associate member of regional cooperation body
  3. Not a member of the United Nations
  4. Observer of the Alliance of Small Island States
  5. Neither member nor observer of regional cooperation body
  6. Observer of regional cooperation body
  7. Also a Least developed country
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dramatic Increases in Rate of Coastal Wetland Loss

This issue is especially significant for SMALL ISLANDS, given the importance of preserving coastal wetlands in the face of climate change effects, including especially sea level rise and increased frequency of coastal storms.

abc article dramatic coastal wetland losses 2014 03 20

Posted in Beaches, Climate Change | Leave a comment

Farming with Biodiversity: An Experiment

from the Bay Journal <http://www.bayjournal.com/article/farmer_goes_wild_fostering_native_plants_alongside_organic_produce?utm_source=Chesapeake+Bay+News&utm_campaign=a8532bb12e-Chesapeake_Bay_News4_23_2013&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_71ced15df1-a8532bb12e-61676821>

Farmer goes wild fostering native plants alongside organic produce

The goal is to show how biodiversity creates value, both ecologically and financially.

  • By Whitney Pipkin on March 06, 2014

Landowner Nick Lapham walks with his dog through one of the native meadows he’s fostered to grow wild as natural habitat. A forest in the distance has filled in the hillsides that were once planted as an orchard. (Whitney Pipkin)
Nick Lapham shows some of the cards drawn by an artist who lives on the property. The cards highlight the species promoted by his biodiverse style of farming. (Whitney Pipkin)
Organic carrots harvested from the farm in early October wait to be washed. (Whitney Pipkin)
The flowering native meadows are often abuzz with local pollinators, a habitat improvement that also benefits the organic farm. (Whitney Pipkin)
Assorted organic squashes are stored in coolers on the farm, to be sold to customers through its CSA program or at farmers markets. (Whitney Pipkin)

Landowner Nick Lapham walks with his dog through one of the native meadows he’s fostered to grow wild as natural habitat. A forest in the distance has filled in the hillsides that were once planted as an orchard. (Whitney Pipkin)

In many ways, the more than 400 acres that Nick Lapham manages and farms south of Virginia’s Shenandoah National Park is the wildest it has been since the 1750s.

Native meadows flourish on scattered plots, abuzz with pollinators and busy with coveys of quail scurrying underfoot. Deer and bear wander over from the thickly wooded areas of the national park, helping themselves to apples and pears lingering in the orchard. (Bears don’t seem to mind the deer fences.) Salamanders and pickerelweed are as much a part of the operation as kale and winter squash.

But that’s just the way Lapham, an environmentalist-turned-farmer, wants it.

“It’s amazing to be an hour and 25 minutes from Washington, DC, and to tell people that you have timber rattlesnakes and black bears in your backyard,” Lapham said.

When a family member who had lived on the property a decade ago stopped by for a visit, she couldn’t believe the level of wilderness that had grown up between the farm and the national park that’s now a neighbor.

A lush forest covers the hillside that used to be part of the oldest orchard in Rappahannock County. Lapham said the same family that got the farm through a land grant in the mid-1700s owned it until the mid-1990s, clearing and farming much of what has now returned to forest.

“To me, what makes this exciting is to be at that intersection and really look at merging conservation and agriculture,” Lapham said. “Is that doable?”

After his career in international environmental policy in the Clinton administration and for the U.N. Foundation, the 44-year-old Lapham moved his family from “big Washington” to Little Washington, VA. He bought the farm, located near the iconic food destination, Inn at Little Washington, in 2006.

He admitted to not knowing much about farming at the time, and his breadth of conservation knowledge was limited in many ways to the big picture.

“I wanted to see if I could find a way to operate a business consistent with the values and principles that I had been espousing,” he said from his kitchen table in the historic farmhouse where he now lives most of the time.

He set out to manage a farm in the context of a greater ecosystem. In a grand experiment he views as a (partially self-funded) continuation of his environmental career, Lapham wants to see if the two can flourish together as part of a financially and ecologically viable venture.

Farm biologist?

To that end, his may be the only small-scale farm in the country with a conservation biologist on staff.

Sam Quinn was the only biologist employed by a farm at the International Congress for Conservation Biology in Baltimore, where he talked about his unique job to 7,000 attendees this past year.

Quinn, 28, is employed halftime by The Farm at Sunnyside, and halftime by Lapham, himself, who hopes to someday support the position entirely on the farm’s ledger.

As a biologist on a farm, Quinn consults with the farm’s manager, Sean McDermott, on things like pest control and management. He considers how measures that might be good for the produce will impact beneficial species and water quality, and he looks for non-traditional products for selling at markets.

Lapham said that managing a farm for both food and biodiversity creates “a healthy tension between our farmer and our biologist.”

Outside of the farm business, Quinn chips away at a long-term vision for biodiversity on the property. He assesses soil quality in various fields, which helps direct decisions about what to plant where. He measures water quality in ponds and works to restore plants that historically existed on the land.

Lapham said it’s difficult to quantify the value and income that some of these improved practices bring to the farm.

“I’d like to be able to make a case within a few years that these services are adding to the bottom line sufficiently to at least cover the costs,” Lapham said. “Proving that is likely to be one of the more challenging aspects of what we’re about.”

Quinn and Lapham work closely when it comes to one of the most vexing problems for an organic vegetable farm in the middle of the woods: invasive species. The farm was home last year to one of the most robust populations of invasive brown marmorated stinkbugs in the state, according to entomologists from Virginia Tech University.

For a bug that snacks on about 350 different species of plants, the Farm at Sunnyside was like an all-you-can-eat buffet of biodiversity.

Quinn and the rest of the farm’s staff lives on the property in several small dwellings that were already there. (Lapham has placed the property under easement with the Virginia Outdoors Foundation, which limits its ability to be developed further.)

Along with a full-time farm manager, the farm employs 10 other workers at peak season to grow 45 varieties of organic vegetables and fruit.

Just 18 of the total 420 acres are devoted to these main crops, which are sold through a CSA (community-supported agriculture) program on the farm and at DC-area farmers markets.

But the rest play a vital supporting role.

Selling biodiversity

While many farmers in the Chesapeake Bay watershed incorporate practices known to improve soil and water quality, these changes are often bolstered by grants or government funding.

Lapham’s farm has a few acres that were enrolled in the federal Conservation Reserve Program by the previous owner, but he plans to let the contract expire while maintaining those lands in conservation.

He wants to see if the conservation measures he knows are good for the farm’s environment can be good for its bottom line as well — without federal assistance.

“It’s another way of thinking about how biodiversity creates value,” he said. “And if biodiversity is going to survive, it has to create value.”

That’s why, alongside its vegetables, the farm also sells bouquets of black-eyed Susans, butterfly weed and other wildflowers grown in its meadows. Its wildflower honey bears a QR code that takes consumers to the farm’s website, where they can read about the environment that flavored it.

Native paw paws and spicebush berries that grow on the farm have made their way to the market as well. The farm staff suggests to customers that they cut the paw paw in half and spoon it into their mouths like pudding, enjoying an antioxidant-packed fruit that’s been growing locally for generations. The spicebush berries can be ground into a spice or used to flavor mulled cider.

Lapham is looking at growing more of these wild species on the farm, taking advantage of their natural drought resistance and acclimation while educating new audiences on what to do with them.

It turns out that many of these native fruits, like chokeberry, are rich in antioxidants and easier to grow without the use of pesticides or additives.

Lapham also has commissioned an artist who lives on the property to capture the farm’s landscape and creatures in a way that might help tell its story.

The farm began selling cards featuring the art at farmers markets this year. A red-spotted newt stars on one and a cluster of purple-bloomed pickerelweed on another. The flourishing of both species at the farm is an indication of restored aquatic habitats.

A note explaining this is written — in ink harvested from black walnuts on the farm — on the back of each card.

“Intellectually, I love the idea of being able to tell the story and also have art be integral to what we’re doing. It’s another way of educating people about why this stuff is so cool,” Lapham said.

Lapham has many more thoughts on how the farm’s multifariousness could one day bolster its bottom line. He’s always considering how to balance what is best for the farm and its specific environment with what can support it economically.

That’s why he took the fields that would be harvested for hay, which requires fuel and labor to mow, and converted them to naturalized meadows. That’s why they probably won’t continue to struggle with bears and deer and invasive pests to maintain an orchard. The farm will focus instead on vegetables and native plants and not try to “do it all.”

To ask, “What does the land foster?” and plant accordingly is essentially a new approach to farming. Lapham hopes to find — or help establish — a market that supports that kind of thinking, a customer base that truly understands what he’s trying to accomplish.

“The ultimate would be to one day have a market for biodiversity,” he said. “If we create the mosaic of wildlife I want here, it would be for the broader public good.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

It’s NOT the Warming, It’s the VARIABILITY

From the excellent Conservation Magazine from Washington University  —  http://conservationmagazine.org/2014/02/dont-expect-climate-change-reduce-winter-deaths/

[As we’ve said many times, the hardest thing we’ll have to address in Climate Change Adaptation is the greater variability in climate impacts.]

Don’t expect climate change to reduce winter deaths

Conservation This Week

People often think that one silver lining of climate change is that winter-related deaths will drop. But that’s not necessarily the case, researchers have found after studying mortality patterns in the UK. Over the past few decades, the link between cold days and winter deaths has largely vanished.

The team studied excess winter deaths, which are the additional number of deaths in winter compared to those in fall or spring. These deaths could be due to factors such as hypothermia, slipping on ice, or the flu.

From 1951 to 2011, the number of excess winter deaths in England and Wales became less variable, the researchers report in Nature Climate Change. In other words, mortality used to swing wildly from low to high from one year to the next; in recent years, it has been fairly stable.

The team then tried to figure out which factors could explain the yearly variation. From 1951 to 1976, the number of days when the temperature dipped below 5 degrees Celsius seemed to be partly responsible. Housing features, such as central heating and hot water, and the severity of the flu also played a role.

But from 1976 to 2011, only flu activity explained the variation, the researchers found. That means that “milder winters resulting from climate change are unlikely to offer a winter health dividend,” the team writes. Instead, winter deaths have been dropping because houses now provide better protection from the cold, health care has improved, and people at risk are getting more support.

In fact, climate change could even increase winter deaths by making the weather more variable. Sudden drops in temperature have become more common in the UK, and people could be “caught off-guard by abrupt changes,” the researchers warn. They recommend that policymakers continue to encourage housing upgrades, such as improved insulation, and to work toward higher flu vaccination rates. Roberta Kwok | 25 February 2014

Source: Staddon, P.L., H.E. Montgomery, and M.H. Depledge. 2014. Climate warming will not decrease winter mortality. Nature Climate Change doi: 10.1038/nclimate2121.

Image © Natalya Chumak | Shutterstock

pf icon small Dont expect climate change to reduce winter deaths
Posted in Climate Change | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bay Needs More Work and MONITORING

Report: Bay cleanup shows promise; more work and monitoring ahead

  • Stormwater runoff

File photo

Stormwater runoff

Polluted stormwater runoff — such as this sediment-laden water in Annapolis — is a vexing problem for the Chesapeake Bay. A report released Tuesday says several programs to clean the bay are working but more work needs to be done to reduce stormwater runoff.

Posted: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:00 am | Updated: 12:11 pm, Wed Feb 26, 2014.

By E.B. FURGURSON III pfurgurson

Data gleaned from scores of scientific studies indicate elements of the Chesapeake Bay cleanup plan are working.

A report issued Tuesday showed efforts over the past 30 years have reduced pollution, lowered nutrients and slowed sediment in local waterways but more vigilance, hard work and monitoring lies ahead.

That was a primary conclusion of “New Insights: Science-based evidence of water quality improvements, challenges and opportunities in the Chesapeake” which compiled data under the auspices of the Chesapeake Bay Program and its partners the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science and the U.S. Geological Survey.

Those who produced the report over a four-year period hope it will be a useful tool for the public and bay cleanup decision-makers. The public can learn what the considerable bay restoration expenditures have accomplished and managers can see which techniques provide the most promise in particular situations.

The report concluded the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act and reductions in agricultural runoff are all working to improve water quality in the bay and its watershed.

But it also warned that despite those successes, progress could be undermined by not continuing to do the work and not reacting to expected population growth and the development that it will bring. It also cautioned that many efforts suffer a lag time before progress is apparent and that patience is required.

“We have learned the local actions can have positive impacts on water quality, “ said Nick DiPasquale, director of the Chesapeake Bay Program at the report’s release in Annapolis Tuesday. “We are building nature’s resilience back into the bay ecosystem. (The report) is confirmation it can be done. Now we need to refocus and redouble our efforts — in more places, in more ways and with increased dedication.”

Among the primary results:

  • Improvements to wastewater treatment plants have decreased the amount of excess nutrients being dumped into local waters. In some areas that has led to a resurgence in underwater grasses.
  • Reducing nitrogen spewing into the atmosphere from vehicles and power plants under the Clean Air Act have led to less pollution in streams and the bay.
  • Checking nutrient pollution from agricultural runoff through cover crops, managing fertilizer and manure application can reduce nutrients in waterways.

A major component just getting underway is stormwater pollution control to curb nitrogen, phosphorous and sediment pollution. There are techniques beginning to be applied to correct years of unchecked stormwater runoff in many older urban and newer suburban areas of the 64,000 square-mile watershed, home to 17 million people.

“We are not seeing much intensity in stormwater practices out there yet,” said Rich Batuik, the bay program’s associate director for science.

Evidence in one Anne Arundel study included in the report showed mixed results reducing nitrogen in certain stream restoration designs, but good reductions in sediment, which carries phosphorous.

Continued scientific monitoring of new techniques and theories used in the struggle to mend the bay is vital, the report stressed.

If a method is shown not to work, then adjustments can be made and lessons can be learned.

“The study is checking reality. We have this blueprint for the bay. But to see it as a perfect thing that will lead us to Valhalla is nonsense,” said John Boesch, president of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. He said with this study and future monitoring, “We can see where things are not happening and understand why.”

“Some practices work better than others,” bay program spokesman Margaret Enloe said. “The location of a stream, or a restoration effort makes a difference. It seems everyone wants a simple solution to a very complex problem.”

© 2014 CapitalGazette.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted in Erosion & Sediment Control, Monitoring | Leave a comment

Watershed Impacts of Development in the BVI

Happened to come across this article in an old on-line issue of BVI Yachting and Property Guide on critical sustainable development issues in the BVI by Shannon Gore of Coastal Management Consulting <http://www.cmcbvi.com/>:

Smart Development
Written by Shannon Gore
Friday, 05 October 2012
Numerous articles have been written regarding island erosion, coral reef degradation from sedimentation and impacts from the loss of wetlands, but these are all actually just small parts of a much bigger picture. A watershed is an area of land in which all water that is under it or drains off it flows into the same place. The term never seems to come into conversation when arguing about environmental degradation but without watershed management, we will lose the very same resources people come to see – white sandy beaches, crystal blue waters, healthy reefs and lush green dramatic landscapes. On top of that, local residents will experience more landslides and flooding.
Image
The simplest way to explain what multi-dimensional and highly complex systems watersheds are is to use the “ridge to reef” concept that states both upland areas (up to the top of the hill) and receiving coastal waters (coral reefs and seagrass beds) are affected by all development between the two. Our high volcanic islands consist of numerous watersheds, in fact, according to a 1990 watershed survey carried out by the Agriculture Department, Tortola alone has 41 watersheds.
For islands like Anegada that are relatively flat, the entire island is the watershed.
There are ways to minimize impacts from development but unless you understand what a watershed is and how it works, mitigation measures will fail miserably. People simply forget that for every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction. Not understanding what reaction could happen, will more likely cost you a lot of money to fix the problem or at the least, make for angry neighbours.The first step in understanding watersheds is to realize the underlying geologic structure of the bedrock guides how stable a hillside is and whether or not it is prone to landslides. Without going into the geologic complexities of our islands, the Department of Disaster Management has employed various technical experts to carry out the research necessary to better understand our islands’ geologic makeup and also conducts hazard vulnerability assessments on new developments.

Throughout the BVI, the soil overlaying bedrock is thin and with low permeability of underlying bedrock, rainfall runs over the surface and down steep hillsides through ghut channels and either directly into the bays or into wetland areas. This simplistic hydrologic model is complicated when human activities such as deforestation, infilling of wetlands, road cutting and carving gigantic holes in the hillside occur. There is nothing wrong with development but people forget the reaction to such actions results in accelerated erosion rates of soil that ends up in coastal waters degrading water quality and killing the reefs. There is also the reaction of flooding in areas where it never flooded before, especially after a pond has been filled in since water no longer has anywhere else to go but places such as outside your front doorstep. Mitigating these reactions to development is all part of watershed management.

Prevention is the key but in many cases, as development continues, these problems continue to occur throughout the Caribbean. So what do you do? To start with, the amount of water on the hillside has to be reduced before reaching the bottom of the hill. Every individual building on an island contributes to the collective amount of water that is redirected from what would have otherwise been a natural route towards a ghut or filtered and absorbed through vegetation; instead, the water finds a new way down the hill. Improving the efficiency of drainage around a building such as through the use of swales (to slow water down) or redirecting water towards natural ghuts is a start. Also creating more permeable surface areas to compensate what was lost from making the building footprint impervious. Terracing not only provides more permeable surface area to hold water, but plants make for a much better landscape than a concrete retaining wall. Terracing is also a lot cheaper than putting up a big grey wall.

There is always going to be water that makes it to the bottom of the hill, which is why wetlands and ponds are so important. Wetlands provide a place for water to settle before being filtered out to sea. However, the concept to re-establish ponds by digging a big hole where it used to be sounds like a good idea but it’s a bit more complicated. First off, it’s not always possible since new buildings don’t move very easily. Secondly, more water volume flows off most hills these days than 50 years ago since there are a lot more buildings. If the same ponds did still exist, they would be over capacity. Re-designing a pond that will be functional requires, at minimum, the expertise of an engineer, hydrologist AND wetland specialist, but finding all three on the same island is extremely rare.

So the next time you see problems such as flooding or murky water near the coastline after a rainfall, ask yourself if where you live or work has contributed to the problem.

Last Updated ( Friday, 05 October 2012 )
Posted in Climate Change, Development, Erosion & Sediment Control, Watershed Management | Leave a comment

Account of Cruise Ship (Cunard Victoria) to Pitcairn Island . . .

from the blog of a long-time buddy (college, actually)

Diary == 2014
a periodic photographic diary …

← Pitcairn Island, Australia == February 16, 2014 Sunday == Say Hello to the Descendants of the Bounty Mutineers
Current Header = Moai Statues on Easter Island = February 13, 2014 →

The Southern Pacific Ocean approaching Tahiti == February 17, 2014 Monday == Pitcairn Island is down to only One Dog

Posted on February 17, 2014 by petecrow
East of Pepeete, Tahiti, February 17, 2014 Monday

The stop at Pitcairn Island was a hoot. Promptly at 7:30am a small boat loaded with the entire population of the island (minus 5 elderly) could be seen pushing off from a landing through binoculars and here they came piled everywhichway in the boat. Young, old, tattooed and universally friendly, white and English.

Almost all of them are descendants of Fletcher Christian who led the mutiny on the Bounty and then hid out here to avoid capture in 1790 until he himself was murdered in a dispute over women with the natives on the small island a few years later.

Not to worry – wooden replicas of the Bounty were for sale for $125 – tee shirts for upwards to $45 with “Mutiny!” inscribed on the front. Once on board the 50 or so residents set up a huge shop of stores in the Queens Room, and one of their number, gave two really interesting and intelligent lectures in the theater .

While they sold their goods and the lady spoke, the Victoria slowly chugged around the island until, nearing noon, all of the Pitcairn residents (7th Day Adventists, by the way) were put back in their boat and off they went home.

Along the way they invited anyone who might like to move to Pitcairn to come right along – “we would love to have you all move here.”

Pitcairn is a British Overseas Territory, not as I wrote and was earlier told, a property belonging to Australia. It has one policeman (I met him in an elevator) and one doctor. The island is down to one dog. They get provisioned every four weeks and see about a dozen cruise ships a year. Economically they are kept alive by subsidies by the British government. The Pitcairn governor is in New Zealand where the kids from Pitcairn are also sent to go to high school. New Zealand is not exactly around the block – think 3,000 miles or more.

Next we sail a couple of days and pull into Tahiti.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment