From the MARAPA (artisanal fisheries cooperative) Facebook pages — photo taken on a whale watching cruise organized by MARAPA.
bp
From the MARAPA (artisanal fisheries cooperative) Facebook pages — photo taken on a whale watching cruise organized by MARAPA.
bp
I don’t often enthuse over cookbook solutions to major strategic questions, but this article that Sean Southey recommended on his Facebook page makes a lot of sense for those of us involved in promoting change:
From Forbes magazine <http://www.forbes.com/sites/skollworldforum/2013/08/01/the-5-secrets-of-storytelling-for-social-change/>
ENTREPRENEURS
|
8/01/2013 @ 2:05PM |2,708 views
The 5 Secrets Of Storytelling For Social Change
1 comments, 1 called-out
Comment NowFollow Comments
Editor’s Note: Jim Berk is Chief Executive Officer of Participant Media, a Los Angeles-based entertainment company that focuses on socially relevant, commercially viable feature films, documentaries and television, as well as publishing and digital media.
What we do is not new. There have always been socially relevant films that inspired us and spoke to the challenges of the time, movies that helped us understand important issues and thrust them into the zeitgeist—Hotel Rwanda, Norma Rae, Erin Brockovich, Gandhi. Films like this were and still are part of a studio’s slate, but what makes Participant unique is that socially relevant content is our entire focus.
Participant’s Founder Jeff Skoll believed that people, if inspired, and given the tools, would work to make the world a better place. Our strategy: to tell stories that illuminate the issues shaping our world and then invite the audience to become engaged.
Nine and a half years later, after 43 films, thousands of social action events, and, so far this year, over 15 million social actions completed through our digital platform, TakePart.com, we have empirical evidence that you can both entertain and accelerate positive social change. These learnings have happened over time. We have spent—and continue to spend—an inordinate amount of time working to understand what makes people get involved, what makes them interested in issues and how we can present the story in a way that is so meaningful that they raise their hand and say, ‘I want to do something. I have something to say.“
We have learned that lasting change occurs when people trust the source, believe they have the full story and make a personal connection. With this in mind we have refined five strategies to use entertainment to inspire and compel social change.
TELL A STORY & SHINE A LIGHT
It all starts with a good story. It’s how you establish an emotional connection. For us, the story is primary. Without this we will not move forward with a project, no matter how important the issue.
Within the context of a story you can integrate information, which not only make the story richer, but can also simplify a complex issue. Even though Contagion is a suspense thriller about a global pandemic, we grounded the story in scientific facts to do two things: add plausibility to the film’s premise and allow us to embed learning moments within the story.
If you want to get people to engage, you first have to get their interest.
Take an issue like climate change. The sheer volume of information and counter-information is overwhelming. Before An Inconvenient Truth was released, polls suggested that fewer than 30% of Americans believed global warming was a real issue. So our focus was to create a campaign that was an understandable distillation of an extremely complex issue and offer pathways for the audience to learn more and to take action. This approach also allowed us to continue the experience off the screen and take it into the community, the classroom and online. We created a downloadable curriculum that reached 180k educators in the United States. After the film’s release, six countries (England, Scotland, Czech Republic, New Zealand, Germany, Australia and Canada) incorporated the curriculum into their secondary schools.
COLLABORATE
We like to say that saving the world is a team sport. Partners are not just additive; they are essential and create an exponential effect. With our film Food Inc., we set out to pull back the screen of misinformation and misdirection and educate people about how agribusiness and our current food policy affect them. We also formed a coalition of over 100 partners to provide real-world actions people could take to make informed choices about their diet and nutrition. We distributed a curriculum to over 17,000 classrooms. In addition, 3000 high schools received discussion guides and DVD’s to continue the conversation. We still talk weekly to over half a million people in our food community on TakePart.com about issues related to the food industry.
With our documentary Waiting for “Superman,” we worked with over 200 organizations who care deeply about the issue of education in America, but did not necessarily agree on a single set of solutions. But that’s ok. To us, part of media literacy is insuring that all sides of the issue are represented. We used the film as a way for everyone to work together to propel education into the national conversation. In the end, our mission isn’t to get people to think a certain way, it’s to get them to just think!
EMPOWER INVOLVEMENT
With Countdown to Zero we targeted seven key states where Senators were unsure how they were going to vote to ratify the New Start Treaty. Their vote was the difference between passage and failure. Because they were given a specific action that spoke to a moment of decision and a tangible positive impact, people responded.
A Place at The Table examines the issue of hunger in America through the stories of three food-insecure individuals. The film was a way to introduce the fact that nearly 50 million Americans go to bed either hungry or not sure where their next meal is coming from. We knew we had to articulate disturbing information, much of which most people were unaware. So with a consortium of non-profits we co-created common messaging to demystify the stigmas around SNAP, designed and launched a national action center where anyone in the country could access both local and national resources to help themselves or to help others, and hosted community screenings across the country to facilitate conversations around this issue. Our goal? To help communities address food insecurity in their local markets.
The Visitor told the story of how many detainees have no access to representation at deportation hearings. Upon researching the issue, we found there was no database of case studies for lawyers to cite when representing a client. With law firm O’Melveny & Myers, we created a program to train lawyers to provide pro-bono representation, and with several non-profits created a national database of cases for lawyers to use for precedence research. To date we have trained over 250 lawyers.SPEAK TO YOUR AUDIENCE
Sometimes the source material is so expansive that you have to research what your audience really knows and where you might have the biggest impact. With Lincoln we conducted original research to inform the focus of our education and action outreach. The findings told us that more than half of Americans think that Lincoln is one of our best Presidents, which is not necessarily surprising, but two-thirds said they knew little or nothing about the 16th President’s accomplishments. This information guided our decision to reach out to schools as the conduit to the younger generation. Working with our partners we created a discussion guide and provided both the DVD and curriculum to all 37,000 middle and high schools in the country.
Through feature films and the accompanying social action campaigns we have been able to tell stories in a big way, garner a great deal of media attention around issues and engage a large audience. This is why they will always be a core part of our business. However, films don’t allow us to continuously talk to our audience. This is what has fueled the creation of Pivot, our new socially minded television network for Millennials that launches in over 40 million homes on August 1st.
But again, before we went forward, we set out to understand the television marketplace and our audience and how they view content and process information. Most people are familiar with the demographic of Millennials, whom we like to call, ‘The New Greatest Generation’. They are now the largest and arguably most influential generation, but also the hardest to reach.
These 18-34 year olds are being shaped by both crisis and opportunity, 9/11, climate change and safety concerns—while in many cases still being supported by their parents. Millennials define success differently than other generations. When it comes to television, movies and all things media, they are looking for authentic, transparent, independent sources of information they can trust.
BE AUTHENTIC AND TRANSPARENT
Just as Participant is unique in its approach to the film business, Pivot will endeavor to be unique as well. What makes Pivot unlike any other channel is its unprecedented commitment to integrating media literacy into every element of the channel. We want our audience to be aware of and learn to consider the sources of information and media they consume, recognize their role as a source when producing or sharing content, and explore the trade-offs inherent in giving up personal information online. Working with organizations like the National Association for Media Literacy Education (NAMLE), we are creating an on-going flow of programming specifically designed to inform, educate and inspire interest in this area. Pivot will also have a dedicated digital presence designed to expand the network’s initiative around consumption of news and information and sharing and production of content.
Simply, Pivot will integrate media literacy into the channel in ways not seen before in television—not only because it’s the right thing to do, but also because it serves our enlightened self interest. It’s not just storytelling that creates engagement and social impact; it’s understanding the information within the story and believing the source. This is why media literacy is so important to us.
If we get this right we can help empower millions of people to work towards a world of peace and sustainability. So the stakes are high.
Edward R. Murrow said it best: ‘There is a great and perhaps decisive battle to be fought against ignorance, intolerance and indifference.’
Not sure I buy into “Strong Towns'” prescription (haven’t looked at the actual data, but there are several links at the bottom of this article), but their diagnosis is confirmed by a lot of our own experiences and observations, and I wish more local government planners, policy makers, and managers realized how unsustainable current “growth-to-infinity development” models really are.
from <http://www.strongtowns.org/the-growth-ponzi-scheme/>
The Growth Ponzi Scheme
This article originally appeared in Grist. It is available at no charge for non-commercial reprinting. Please credit Strong Towns and link back to our site at www.strongtowns.org.
We often forget that the American pattern of suburban development is an experiment, one that has never been tried anywhere before. We assume it is the natural order because it is what we see all around us. But our own history — let alone a tour of other parts of the world — reveals a different reality. Across cultures, over thousands of years, people have traditionally built places scaled to the individual. It is only the last two generations that we have scaled places to the automobile.
How is our experiment working?
At Strong Towns, the nonprofit, nonpartisan organization I cofounded in 2009, we are most interested in understanding the intersection between local finance and land use. How does the design of our places impact their financial success or failure?
What we have found is that the underlying financing mechanisms of the suburban era — our post-World War II pattern of development — operates like a classic Ponzi scheme, with ever-increasing rates of growth necessary to sustain long-term liabilities.
Since the end of World War II, our cities and towns have experienced growth using three primary mechanisms:
- Transfer payments between governments: where the federal or state government makes a direct investment in growth at the local level, such as funding a water or sewer system expansion.
- Transportation spending: where transportation infrastructure is used to improve access to a site that can then be developed.
- Public and private-sector debt: where cities, developers, companies, and individuals take on debt as part of the development process, whether during construction or through the assumption of a mortgage.
In each of these mechanisms, the local unit of government benefits from the enhanced revenues associated with new growth. But it also typically assumes the long-term liability for maintaining the new infrastructure. This exchange — a near-term cash advantage for a long-term financial obligation — is one element of a Ponzi scheme.
The other is the realization that the revenue collected does not come near to covering the costs of maintaining the infrastructure. In America, we have a ticking time bomb of unfunded liability for infrastructure maintenance. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) estimates the cost at $5 trillion — but that’s just for major infrastructure, not the minor streets, curbs, walks, and pipes that serve our homes.
The reason we have this gap is because the public yield from the suburban development pattern — the amount of tax revenue obtained per increment of liability assumed — is ridiculously low. Over a life cycle, a city frequently receives just a dime or two of revenue for each dollar of liability. The engineering profession will argue, as ASCE does, that we’re simply not making the investments necessary to maintain this infrastructure. This is nonsense. We’ve simply built in a way that is not financially productive.
We’ve done this because, as with any Ponzi scheme, new growth provides the illusion of prosperity. In the near term, revenue grows, while the corresponding maintenance obligations — which are not counted on the public balance sheet — are a generation away.
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, we completed one life cycle of the suburban experiment, and at the same time, growth in America slowed. There were many reasons involved, but one significant factor was that our suburban cities were now starting to experience cash outflows for infrastructure maintenance. We’d reached the “long term,” and the end of easy money.
It took us a while to work through what to do, but we ultimately decided to go “all in” using leverage. In the second life cycle of the suburban experiment, we financed new growth by borrowing staggering sums of money, both in the public and private sectors. By the time we crossed into the third life cycle and flamed out in the foreclosure crisis, our financing mechanisms had, out of necessity, become exotic, even predatory.
One of humanity’s greatest strengths — our ability to innovate solutions to complex problems — can be a detriment when we misdiagnose the problem. Our problem was not, and is not, a lack of growth. Our problem is 60 years of unproductive growth — growth that has buried us in financial liabilities. The American pattern of development does not create real wealth. It creates the illusion of wealth. Today we are in the process of seeing that illusion destroyed, and with it the prosperity we have come to take for granted.
That is now our greatest immediate challenge. We’ve actually embedded this experiment of suburbanization into our collective psyche as the “American dream,” a non-negotiable way of life that must be maintained at all costs. What will we throw away trying to sustain the unsustainable? How much of our dwindling wealth will be poured into propping up this experiment gone awry?
We need to end our investments in the suburban pattern of development, along with the multitude of direct and indirect subsidies that make it all possible. Further, we need to intentionally return to our traditional pattern of development, one based on creating neighborhoods of value, scaled to actual people. When we do this, we will inevitably rediscover our traditional values of prudence and thrift as well as the value of community and place.
The way we achieve real, enduring prosperity is by building an America full of what we call Strong Towns.
This article is a summary of a larger series on the Growth Ponzi Scheme. The complete series can be read by following these links:
- Day 4: How we’ve sustained the unsustainable by going “all in” on the suburban pattern of development.
Reprints of this article and other coverage/discussion of the Growth Ponzi Scheme:
- Grist.org (June 22, 2011)
- MetaFilter Web Dialog (June 23, 2011)
- Natural Communities (June 23, 2011)
- Kaid Benfield on NRDC Switchboard (June 24, 2011)
- Lloyd Alter at treehugger.com (June 24, 2011)
- Sustainable Cities Collective (June 24, 2011)
- Bluegrass reVISIONS (June 24, 2011)
- Backyard Farming (June 25, 2011)
- Underpaid Genius (June 26, 2011)
- The Weekly Sift (June 27, 2011)
- Pacific Free Press (June 28, 2011)
Well, not exactly, but before you buy one of these 1000+ houses proposed for the mouth of the Chester River, you might want to check predictions for sea level rise in this part of the Bay — it’s big!
from the Chesapeake Bay Daily of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation <http://cbf.typepad.com/bay_daily/2013/08/what-do-you-see-in-this-picture-the-blue-waters-of-the-mouth-of-the-chester-river-as-it-flows-into-the-chesapeake-bay-a.html#more>:
Pictures Show Chesapeake Bay Waterfront Threatened by New Jersey Developer
What do you see in this picture? The blue waters of the mouth of the Chester River, as it flows into the Chesapeake Bay. A scenic shoreline on Kent Island, with a tree casting a shadow beside a farm field. Clouds drifting peacefully overhead.
Here’s what you don’t see: 1,079 houses and condominiums that New Jersey-based developer Hovnanian Enterprises is proposing to build right here, blacktopping much of this waterfront scenery.
This photo –- and the massive Four Seasons housing project planned here, north of Route 50 in Stevensville, Maryland — is an illustration of weaknesses in Maryland’s environmental and land-use laws. The development may be one of the largest ever built within 1,000 feet of the Chesapeake Bay since the 1984 passage of Maryland’s landmark Critical Areas law, which is supposed to protect waterfront areas.
Economic development is great, but it should be well planned. And there is no need for a massive construction project like this in fields right on the banks of the Chesapeake Bay. Kent Island is already overwhelmed with residential development and traffic problems, and the waterfront land here is vulnerable to flooding and sea level rise.
On July 24, the Maryland Board of Public Works (made up of Governor Martin O’Malley; Comptroller Peter Franchot; and Treasurer Nancy Kopp) decided not to act on the developer’s request for a state license to destroy wetlands on the 425-acre development site. (The plans for the site are shown at left)
Jay Falstad, Executive Director of the Queen Anne’s Conservation Association (below), shook his head in disgust as he looked out on the fields threatened by the project on a recent morning. “It is our view that putting in this type of development -– to this size and scale -– on the waters of the Chester and the Chesapeake makes no sense,” Falstad said.
“Hopefully, the legislature -– and certainly the governor, the comptroller and the treasurer -– will find a way…to deny the wetlands license and prevent this monstrosity from occurring.”
The state board’s decision last week sent the project back down to the Queen Anne’s County government, which approved a controversial development agreement for the project more than a decade ago. The county must now consider a land preservation easement for part of the land that the builders say they will protect as a park. And the local government may also consider amending the development agreement to add additional environmental protections.
Some conservationists believe the county should now go back to the drawing board and reconsider – and hold more public hearings and votes on – the whole project. The developers maintain such a new round of local approvals and hearings will not be necessary.
The best resolution now could be to have the state and perhaps partners step in and buy the land, turning it into a public park or wildlife preserve.
The immediate picture is the snapshot at the top of this story: Beautiful waterfront property threatened with yet more ugly suburban sprawl.
But the bigger question is about control over development decisions. Yes, local governments deserve some control over land use within their boundaries. But huge projects such as the Four Seasons can cause harm far beyond municipal boundaries –- including to traffic on state and federal roads, and runoff pollution that flows downstream to contaminate the Chesapeake Bay and other bodies of water.
These issues transcend local political boundaries. And so control over projects like this should include more authority for state governments that can step back and take a more global view. The question should be: What’s in the best interests of everybody, not just the best interest of a few developers and local supporters interested in short-term cash.
We all have a stake in a healthy Chesapeake Bay. And so we should all raise our voices to oppose poorly-conceived projects like the Four Seasons.
By Tom Pelton
Chesapeake Bay Foundation
Also keep in mind Hovnanian’s reputation for environmental compliance (NOT), as illustrated by this selection from the first page of a Google search on “Hovnanian” and “fines.”
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. Settlement Information Sheet | Civil …
www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/civil/cwa/hovnanian.html
Jump to Civil Penalty – As part of the settlement, Hovnanian has agreed to pay a total civil penalty of $1 million to the United States, the District of Columbia …
Hovnanian Enterprises and PulteGroup, Inc. Settle Clean Water Act
yosemite.epa.gov/opa/…nsf/0/7625F14D264560B285257B2600764688
Mar 6, 2013 – (PHILADELPHIA – March 6, 2013) Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and PulteGroup, Inc. have agreed to pay civil penalties of $130,000 and $56,000 …
DOCUMENT: U.S. EPA fines Hovnanian for runoff water …
www.morningjournal.com/articles/2010/04/22/news/mj2633641.txt
Apr 22, 2010 – The Morning Journal is your source for all Northeast Ohio 24-hour breaking news, local news, sports, entertainment and more. View daily …
Homebuilders to Pay $186K in EPA Case : Durability + Design News
www.durabilityanddesign.com/news/?fuseaction=view&id=9275
Mar 11, 2013 – Founded in 1959, Hovnanian operates in 17 states. The company has agreed to settle EPA’s allegations with a $130,000 penalty and other …
Hovnanian Fined For EPA Violations – Two River Times
www.trtnj.com/issues/100430/news4.php
Hovnanian Fined For EPA Violations. By John Burton. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., one of the largest homebuilders in the country, and headquartered in Red …
Feds fine top home company $1 million – Severn River Association
severnriver.org/press/fedsfinetop.htm
Apr 22, 2010 – Hovnanian Enterprises must pay a $1 million fine and improve its stormwater controls at construction sites as a result of a consent decree …
- [PDF]
Stormwater Pollution Prevention.pdf – K. Hovnanian® Homes
images.khov.com/…/Stormwater%20Pollution%20Prevention.pdf
Mar 25, 2010 – … working at a. K. Hovnanian site in regard to stormwater compliance.… Potential fines are very large; as much as $36,000 per violation, per …
Water Pollution | Builder to pay $1 million for pollution violations …
articles.baltimoresun.com/…/bs-gr-hovnanian-stormwater-20100421_1_…
EPA settles with Hovnanian over projects in Md., 17 other states. April 21, 2010|By Timothy B. … EPA fines city, counties for pollution violations. October 29, 2010.
Eastern Shore homebuilder investigated for storm water runoff | The …
www.publicintegrity.org › … › Maryland
Aug 20, 2008 – Hovnanian, which has been fighting for almost a decade to … The policy change left builders open to investigation and large fines, and they are …
from a Stanford University press release. . . . . <http://news.stanford.edu/news/2013/august/climate-change-speed-080113.html>
Stanford Report, August 1, 2013Climate change on pace to occur 10 times faster than any change recorded in past 65 million years, Stanford scientists say
Not only is the planet undergoing one of the largest climate changes in the past 65 million years, Stanford climate scientists Noah Diffenbaugh and Chris Field report that it’s on pace to occur at a rate 10 times faster than any change in that period. Without intervention, this extreme pace could lead to a 5-6 degree Celsius spike in annual temperatures by the end of the century.
BY BJORN CAREY
Courtesy of Stanford University
The top map shows global temperatures in the late 21st century, based on current warming trends. The bottom map illustrates the velocity of climate change, or how far species in any given area will need to migrate by the end of the 21st century to experience climate similar to present. (Click image to enlarge)
The planet is undergoing one of the largest changes in climate since the dinosaurs went extinct. But what might be even more troubling for humans, plants and animals is the speed of the change. Stanford climate scientists warn that the likely rate of change over the next century will be at least 10 times quicker than any climate shift in the past 65 million years.
If the trend continues at its current rapid pace, it will place significant stress on terrestrial ecosystems around the world, and many species will need to make behavioral, evolutionary or geographic adaptations to survive.
Although some of the changes the planet will experience in the next few decades are already “baked into the system,” how different the climate looks at the end of the 21st century will depend largely on how humans respond.
The findings come from a review of climate research by Noah Diffenbaugh, an associate professor of environmental Earth system science, and Chris Field, a professor of biology and of environmental Earth system science and the director of the Department of Global Ecology at the Carnegie Institution. The work is part of a special report on climate change in the current issue ofScience.
Diffenbaugh and Field, both senior fellows at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, conducted the targeted but broad review of scientific literature on aspects of climate change that can affect ecosystems, and investigated how recent observations and projections for the next century compare to past events in Earth’s history.
For instance, the planet experienced a 5 degree Celsius hike in temperature 20,000 years ago, as Earth emerged from the last ice age. This is a change comparable to the high-end of the projections for warming over the 20th and 21st centuries.
The geologic record shows that, 20,000 years ago, as the ice sheet that covered much of North America receded northward, plants and animals recolonized areas that had been under ice. As the climate continued to warm, those plants and animals moved northward, to cooler climes.
“We know from past changes that ecosystems have responded to a few degrees of global temperature change over thousands of years,” said Diffenbaugh. “But the unprecedented trajectory that we’re on now is forcing that change to occur over decades. That’s orders of magnitude faster, and we’re already seeing that some species are challenged by that rate of change.”
Some of the strongest evidence for how the global climate system responds to high levels of carbon dioxide comes from paleoclimate studies. Fifty-five million years ago, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was elevated to a level comparable to today. The Arctic Ocean did not have ice in the summer, and nearby land was warm enough to support alligators and palm trees.
“There are two key differences for ecosystems in the coming decades compared with the geologic past,” Diffenbaugh said. “One is the rapid pace of modern climate change. The other is that today there are multiple human stressors that were not present 55 million years ago, such as urbanization and air and water pollution.”
Record-setting heat
Diffenbaugh and Field also reviewed results from two-dozen climate models to describe possible climate outcomes from present day to the end of the century. In general, extreme weather events, such as heat waves and heavy rainfall, are expected to become more severe and more frequent.
For example, the researchers note that, with continued emissions of greenhouse gases at the high end of the scenarios, annual temperatures over North America, Europe and East Asia will increase 2-4 degrees C by 2046-2065. With that amount of warming, the hottest summer of the last 20 years is expected to occur every other year, or even more frequently.
By the end of the century, should the current emissions of greenhouse gases remain unchecked, temperatures over the northern hemisphere will tip 5-6 degrees C warmer than today’s averages. In this case, the hottest summer of the last 20 years becomes the new annual norm.
“It’s not easy to intuit the exact impact from annual temperatures warming by 6 C,” Diffenbaugh said. “But this would present a novel climate for most land areas. Given the impacts those kinds of seasons currently have on terrestrial forests, agriculture and human health, we’ll likely see substantial stress from severely hot conditions.”
The scientists also projected the velocity of climate change, defined as the distance per year that species of plants and animals would need to migrate to live in annual temperatures similar to current conditions. Around the world, including much of the United States, species face needing to move toward the poles or higher in the mountains by at least one kilometer per year. Many parts of the world face much larger changes.
The human element
Some climate changes will be unavoidable, because humans have already emitted greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, and the atmosphere and oceans have already been heated.
“There is already some inertia in place,” Diffenbaugh said. “If every new power plant or factory in the world produced zero emissions, we’d still see impact from the existing infrastructure, and from gases already released.”
The more dramatic changes that could occur by the end of the century, however, are not written in stone. There are many human variables at play that could slow the pace and magnitude of change – or accelerate it.
Consider the 2.5 billion people who lack access to modern energy resources. This energy poverty means they lack fundamental benefits for illumination, cooking and transportation, and they’re more susceptible to extreme weather disasters. Increased energy access will improve their quality of life – and in some cases their chances of survival – but will increase global energy consumption and possibly hasten warming.
Diffenbaugh said that the range of climate projections offered in the report can inform decision-makers about the risks that different levels of climate change pose for ecosystems.
“There’s no question that a climate in which every summer is hotter than the hottest of the last 20 years poses real risks for ecosystems across the globe,” Diffenbaugh said. “However, there are opportunities to decrease those risks, while also ensuring access to the benefits of energy consumption.”
In response to a recent tweet from the CaribJournal that we relayed to some of our e-mail groups, we got the following tongue-in-cheek response to the linked press release extolling the completion of four units of the Zemi Beach (Anguilla) luxury residential project:
Anguilla’s @zemibeach Project Completes First Four Homes caribjournal.com/2013/07/29/ang… #anguilla
[In case you were wondering, this is a Zemi
“[The article] is also an example of the misuse of Twitter to promote lies and hype.”
The four units were completed last year. The present announcement is non-news.
As I understand it, they sit there unsold because selling $3 million condos isn’t going so well on an island where Chief Minister Hubert Hughes loudly announces that war has been declared on the evil British and complete political independence is the only solution to what he calls oppression, slavery and genocide.
In November, the construction site was raided by the Immigration Task Force. Many Spanish-speaking workers were taken away and all construction stopped for months. Both the developer and government have failed to respond to questions, except to predict various conflicting completion dates for the project.
The number of proposed units per acre rivals, in my opinion, slum dwellings. Our Chief Minister defines a good project as one which has the most units per acre.
Our beloved leader’s memorable comments rival those of the developer:
<http://www.zemibeach.com/page/responsibilities>
“Developed with sustainability in mind. The backers of Zemi Beach are committed to following best practices in respect to the land and the people of Anguilla:
“The construction remains environmentally conscious, minimizing resources and avoiding heavy emissions and excess waste.”
Zemi Beach has stripped every leaf, every blade of grass, from their 6+ acres of land next to the Fountain National Park. As the land slopes down to the beach, this seems likely to create a river of mud the next time there’s a sustained, heavy rain, which will disperse out toward the reefs. Siltation kills reefs. Dead reefs don’t support fish.
What is Planning doing? What is the Dept. of Environment doing? What is Tourism doing?
Everything is concealed in secrecy.
***** ends *****
Here’s an example — this from the north coast of Tortola in 2010 — of the kind of “river of mud” the frightened Anguillian refers to. . . .
This article from the CARE-2 web site seems to describe a progression from dirty water to dead manatees . . . the description near the bottom of the article of the brown algae bloom on the Mosquito Lagoon in Florida seems very similar to increasingly opaque waters that I see outside on the banks of streams feeding the Chesapeake Bay, and which was documented with a photo by the Midshore Riverkeeper Conservancy on Facebook just today:
from: http://www.care2.com/causes/manatees-are-dying-with-suspicious-seaweed-in-their-mouths.html
Manatees Are Dying With Suspicious Seaweed in Their Mouths
- by Kristina Chew
- July 17, 2013
- 4:00 am
Manatees have been categorized as endangered since 1973. Thanks to restrictions on motorboats in areas where they live and programs to rescue, treat and release them, their numbers have surged back, from 1,000 about 30 years ago to about 5,000 today. A couple of years ago, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officials even talked about changing the manatee’s status from endangered to threatened.
Budget constraints and other projects took precedence and such efforts were tabled. As it turns out, this has been for the better: in the past few years, manatees have been dying in alarming numbers. In 2010, 282 succumbed to unusually cold temperatures. Starting this past September, toxins from red tide — the recurring algae bloom that was worse than usual in southwest Florida, covering 130,000 acres — took the lives of 272 manatees.
In addition, restrictions on motorboats do not mean that manatees are entirely safe. About 80 to 100 die every year after being hit by boats.
About 100 Manatees Have Died Every Month of This Year
With 2013 about half over, around 600 manatees have died so far. In contrast, only 392 manatee deaths were recorded in 2012.
A federal researcher has pinpointed a toxic algae bloom in the Indian River lagoon as connected to the deaths of some 151 manatees, as well as to those of 51 dolphins and 300 pelicans. The algae blooms kill the seagrass which is a mainstay of the manatees’ diet. The manatees then end up eating seaweed, which proves deadly as toxins are affixed to it.
Indeed, some dead manatees have been found with food still in their mouths and digestive tracts. Researchers have discovered that they have been eating macroalgae, a kind of seaweed. While it is not usually toxic for manatees, scientists suspect something in the sediment in the lagoon, or even from the algae itself, could be rendering it lethal for them.
The dolphins and pelicans seem to be starving to death: as Megan Stolen, a biologist with Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute, says, 85 percent of the bodies of dolphins that she and her team have found are “skin and bones.” Scientists are speculating that their fish stocks could be depleted, or that they have been sickened by parasites, toxins or disease.
In another twist to the mysterious deaths of the manatees and dolphins, some other animals that eat sea grass such as sea turtles have not been affected. Neither have bull sharks, which scavenge dolphin carcasses.
How Did Florida’s Lagoons Become Toxic Algae Pools?
The Indian River Lagoon was designated as an “estuary of national significance” by the EPA in 1990. It runs 156 miles along the eastern coast of Florida and, while only six feet deep, some 3,500 species of wildlife and plants make it their home. As Wired.com notes, the barrier island complex brings in more than $3.7 billion annually from citrus farming, fisheries, recreation, and employment.
Scientists are still trying to figure out how the toxins got into the Indian River Lagoon. Authorities are undertaking a multi-year, $3.7 million protection initiative in an effort to halt the lagoon’s slide from unique ecosystem to an algae-ridden site.
The culprit seems to be a too-familiar one, developments that, over decades, have turned the lagoon into “the drainage pool for leaking septic tanks, polluted streams, and storm water rich with nutrients from fertilizers.” As there are no tides “to push the water around and flush it out,” pollutants and sediments have accumulated in its waters.
Meanwhile, yet another waterway in Florida, Mosquito Lagoon, is covered in a brown algae bloom. As environmentalists and Florida newspapers point out, such algae blooms are yet another sign that Florida has so far failed to enact tougher environmental regulations to protect its waterways. Algae blooms are estimated to result in economic losses of around $230 to $470 million. Nonetheless, Florida governor Rick Scott vetoed a $2 million grant for the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute to study Mosquito Lagoon and find out why its water are now the color of a paper bag.
It goes without saying that it is sadly fortuitous that the Fish and Wildlife Service never got around to reclassifying manatees as threatened rather than extinct. If officials do not act fast to restore, protect and preserve Florida’s lagoons and stop the current and long-term damage to its marine ecosystems, the manatees’ comeback over the past three decades could be over.
[Was surprised to note that NY City and Anne Arundel County have the same length of shoreline (~525 miles). This might be a useful article to circulate to policy makers and managers. <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/10/nyregion/debate-over-cost-and-practicality-of-protecting-part-of-queens-coast.html> . Also encourage folks to review the comments on this article as a preview of debates in Annapolis in the not-so-distant future. ]
Where Streets Flood With the Tide, a Debate Over City Aid
Robert Stolarik for The New York Times
Raising Broad Channel: In this section of Queens, which is built on a marsh jutting into Jamaica Bay, many residents say that despite the repeated flooding, they love their neighborhood and want to stay.By KIA GREGORY
Published: July 9, 2013 73 Comments
As the sun began to set one recent Sunday, saltwater poured off Jamaica Bay onto West 12th Road, one of the lowest-lying areas in New York City.Robert Stolarik for The New York Times
Tidal flooding occurs about twice a month in the neighborhood, one of the lowest-lying areas in New York City.
The New York Times
Robert Stolarik for The New York Times
Tidal flooding occurs about twice a month in Broad Channel, Queens, one of the lowest-lying areas in New York City.
Readers’ Comments
Share your thoughts.
Residents bolted out of their front doors to move their cars, which are often damaged by tidal flooding that occurs here about twice a month. Some older residents were all but imprisoned in their homes until as much as three feet of water receded. Children splashed around, oblivious to the looming threat.
“We do not care about budgets; we are taxpaying people,” said John Heaphy, 69, a lifelong resident of the area, Broad Channel, Queens, which is built on a marsh that juts into the bay. “From the lowest politician to the governor’s office, we’ve been begging, please help us.”
Now, the city is doing just that, budgeting $22 million to try to save the neighborhood by installing bulkheads and by raising streets and sidewalks by three feet.
The Broad Channel project offers a preview of the infrastructure outlays that Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg is envisioning as part of a new $20 billion plan to protect the city’s 520 miles of coast over the next decade from rising sea levels.
But the project also raises fundamental questions about whether, in an era of extreme weather, the government should come to the aid of neighborhoods that are trying to fend off inevitably rising waters.
Broad Channel’s vulnerability was exposed in October during Hurricane Sandy, which toppled homes into the bay, some of which still lie in ruins along the beach. Yet the situation here is far worse than in some other neighborhoods damaged in the hurricane because Broad Channel suffers flooding from the tides and heavy rain, not just from storm surges.
Eric A. Goldstein, a senior lawyer at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental advocacy group, said he was sympathetic to Broad Channel and understood why residents have been lobbying hard for aid.
“The problem is, they have picked a spectacularly beautiful but increasingly impractical and dangerous place to live,” Mr. Goldstein said.
“If sea levels rise and storm-level projections are accurate, this community may be surviving on borrowed time,” he said. He added that the city faced hard questions, one being: “How much sense does it make to keep reinvesting taxpayer dollars in a community that is directly in harm’s way?”
Mr. Goldstein said the city should also consider allocating money to those who wanted to relocate.
Other experts pointed out that these projects were not only costly but also difficult to carry out, and based on techniques that might not always work well over time. They must overcome a phalanx of obstacles before being approved, from reviews by government agencies to a lack of consensus among residents.
The one in Broad Channel has already been held up because officials have not yet been able to obtain consent from some residents, which is required because they technically own the sidewalks.
The Bloomberg administration also has expressed concern about the difficulties of protecting this part of the Queens coast.
When Mayor Bloomberg unveiled his $20 billion plan, he vowed that the city would not abandon the waterfront. But the plan notes that major flood protection along Jamaica Bay would be “extremely expensive, and disruptive, and in some cases nearly impossible.”
As a result, the city wants to ask the United States Army Corps of Engineers to develop a storm-surge barrier across the Rockaway Inlet to protect neighborhoods from Sheepshead Bay to Howard Beach, as well as Broad Channel.
As far as the street-raising, Caswell F. Holloway IV, the deputy mayor for operations, acknowledged that such projects were also challenging.
“It is literally a block-by-block issue, especially older neighborhoods, where the neighborhood grew up much faster than the infrastructure to support it,” Mr. Holloway said. “You’re basically going back, in some cases over the course of many years, to do modern drainage. It’s highly disruptive, it’s expensive, because it’s being laid out after the fact.”
Asked whether the Broad Channel project would only forestall the inevitable, he said, “We focused on a solution that was affordable and would alleviate the flooding situation for a while.”
Residents describe Broad Channel as an oasis with glorious water views. About 3,000 people live here, including many police officers and firefighters.
It is a place where residents cling to tide clocks and, some joke, every child gets wading boots for Christmas. Neighbors will honk a car horn in the middle of the night to warn others of an approaching tide, and some have made pencil markings on their homes to show water levels from storms past.
Proposals to safeguard Broad Channel have been debated for years, but gained momentum only after a major storm in 2010.
To address the flooding, Pete Mahon, 65, a retired prison warden, urged fellow residents to pack community meetings where officials were present.
“It was a river running outside,” Mr. Mahon said, referring to 2010.
The project will begin with workers installing bulkheads at 11th, 12th and 13th Roads. Then they will dig up 12th Road, putting in water mains, drains and sewers. The roads will be raised three feet, and paved into a so-called shared-streets design, meaning cars, bicyclists and pedestrians will share the roadway.
All three should be completed in three years, officials said. Then, they estimate, another six streets will be done.
Officials said the street-elevation plan would eliminate 85 percent of tidal flooding on blocks like 12th Road. They said they hoped to get the project started before Mayor Bloomberg leaves office at the end of the year.
Eight months after Hurricane Sandy, life has slowly returned to normal in Broad Channel. Most mom-and-pop stores have reopened. With insurance money in hand, residents are repairing the damage.
But at the heart of the destruction, on West 12th Road, only about half of the families have returned.
“I think you get used to it over time,” said Dashima Cortez, 40, referring to the tidal flooding. “But Sandy made everyone nervous. Some people don’t ever want to come back.”
As the water flowed in that Sunday, her husband, Scott Valentine, sweaty from hanging drywall in a home damaged by Hurricane Sandy, ran to move his car. In five years of living in Broad Channel, they have lost several brakes and a muffler system to flooding.
They moved back in April.
“This is why you stay,” Ms. Cortez said, pointing to the view off their deck.
Later, Mr. Valentine said: “I would love to never have to move, but it’s not going to get any better.”
Nearby, Frank O’Toole, 35, said he had concerns about the $22 million project. What will happen to his garage on a raised street? And what about the oil tanks that people keep in their crawl spaces? But in any case, he said, he supported the plan.
“They say they have it all worked out,” he said.
Mr. O’Toole said he had no plans to leave Broad Channel, though some of his friends called him crazy for it.
“At this point, we’re just desperate to get it done,” he said of the project, standing in water that reached to his shins.
from Science Daily: <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/07/130708143150.htm>
[As an aside, it seems to me that the low levels of oxygen (e.g.,”below about 4 milligrams per liter“) being measured in the main stem and feeder streams of the South River should cause some re-thinking of the statement that hypoxia is a condition of the “ deep waters of the Bay’s middle reaches,” as highlighted below. ]
‘Dead Zone’ Impacts Chesapeake Bay Fishes
July 8, 2013 — A 10-year study of Chesapeake Bay fishes by researchers at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science provides the first quantitative evidence on a bay-wide scale that low-oxygen “dead zones” are impacting the distribution and abundance of “demersal” fishes — those that live and feed near the Bay bottom.
The affected species — which include Atlantic croaker, white perch, spot, striped bass, and summer flounder — are a key part of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem and support important commercial and recreational fisheries.
The study, published in a recent issue of Marine Ecology Progress Series, was authored by Andre Buchheister, a Ph.D. student in William & Mary’s School of Marine Science at VIMS, along with VIMS colleagues Chris Bonzek, Jim Gartland, and Dr. Rob Latour.
All four authors are involved in VIMS’ Chesapeake Bay Multi-Species Monitoring and Assessment Program (ChesMMAP), an ongoing effort to track and understand interactions between and among fishes and other marine life within the Bay ecosystem.
Buchheister says “This is the first study to document that chronically low levels of dissolved oxygen in Chesapeake Bay can reduce the number and catch rates of demersal fish species on a large scale.” He notes that other studies have looked at the effects of low oxygen on fishes within the water column and on demersal fishes within individual Bay tributaries.
Low-oxygen conditions — what scientists call “hypoxia” — form when excessive loads of nitrogen from fertilizers, sewage, and other sources feed algal blooms in coastal waters. When these algae die and sink, they provide a rich food source for bacteria, which in the act of decomposition take up dissolved oxygen from nearby waters.
In Chesapeake Bay, low-oxygen conditions are most pronounced in mid-summer, and in the deep waters of the Bay’s middle reaches. “This appears to displace fish biomass toward the northern and southern edges of the bay’s mainstem channel,” says Buchheister.
“The drastic decline we saw in species richness, species diversity, and catch rate under low-oxygen conditions is consistent with work from other systems,” he adds. “It suggests that demersal fishes begin to avoid an area when levels of dissolved oxygen drop below about 4 milligrams per liter, as they start to suffer physiological stress.”
The fishes’ response at this value is interesting, says Buchheister, “because it occurs at levels greater than the 2 milligrams per liter that scientists formally use to define hypoxia.” Normal coastal waters contain from 7-8 milligrams of oxygen per liter.
Previous research suggests that oxygen-poor waters can stress fish directly, through increased respiration and elevated metabolism, and also by affecting their prey.
“Low levels of dissolved oxygen stress or kill the bottom-dwelling invertebrates that demersal fishes rely on for food,” says Buchheister. “Prolonged exposure of these invertebrates to hypoxic conditions in the mid-Bay represents a substantial reduction in the habitat available for foraging by demersal fishes baywide, and could reduce the quality of foraging habitat even after bottom waters become re-oxygenated.”
The authors caution, however, that the limits on fish abundance and distribution brought on by low-oxygen conditions are to some degree balanced by the positive effects that nutrients have on production of mid-water and surface-dwelling fishes elsewhere in the Bay. The nutrient-rich waters that encourage dead-zone formation also fuel algal growth, thus turbocharging the base of a food web that ultimately supports fish and other predators.
ChesMMAP
The team’s findings are based on an exhaustive study of the distribution and abundance of late juvenile and adult fishes caught and released in trawl nets during 48 sampling trips between 2002 and 2011, the largest quantitative assessment of the bay-wide demersal fish community ever conducted. The sampling took place at 3,640 ChesMMAP stations throughout the mainstem of Chesapeake Bay.
ChesMMAP, currently funded by Wallop-Breaux funds from the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, was established in 2002 as part of the growing international recognition that a single-species approach to fisheries management does not fully account for the complex interactions within marine ecosystems.
Latour, head of the Multispecies Research Group at VIMS, says “The traditional approach to fisheries management looks at a single species as if it were independent, unaffected by other processes and having no effect on other species. In ChesMMAP and our other multispecies research programs we analyze the interactions between species and their environment, including studies of predator-prey dynamics, seasonal changes in distribution, and water-quality parameters such as temperature, salinity, and DO [dissolved oxygen].”
Salinity
Indeed, the team’s research shows that salinity is the most important factor affecting the distribution of Bay fishes, whether they live near the bottom or towards the surface.
“Salinity was the major environmental gradient structuring community composition, biodiversity, and catch rates in our 10-year dataset,” says Buchheister. “The saltier waters of the lower Bay and the fresher waters of the upper Bay generally have a more diverse and dynamic fish fauna than the middle Bay, whose brackish waters place physiological demands on many aquatic organisms.”
Future value
The value of the ChesMMAP dataset extends beyond the current study. “Our work provides a 10-year frame of reference that can be used to evaluate future large-scale changes in the composition, distribution, and abundance of the Bay’s demersal fish community,” says Latour. “Continued monitoring will be critical for detecting how the Bay ecosystem responds to continued stresses from fishing, development, and climate change. It’s an essential component to a successful management strategy for the marine resources of Chesapeake Bay and the coastal Atlantic.”Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:
Share on stumbleuponShare on linkedinShare on pinterest_shareShare on bloggerShare on diggShare on deliciousShare on newsvine|7