Best Testimony on the Stormwater Restoration Bill

Keaghan Muller presented his own statement to the Anne Arundel County Council on the problems of pollution of county and Chesapeake Bay waters, and why they need to act now to protect the Bay: 

Dear County Councilmen,

My name is Keaghan Muller and I live in Edgewater, MD.

I would like to proclaim that it is not fair that the stormwater runoff is destroying our resources like in the South River— which I live near, we have dirty water and cancerous catfish.

We must pay our share so that future kids can have clean water. We need the Stormwater Restoration Fund bill to pass so that kids and adults can help pay to clean the water. It’s important to me and other kids to have clean water because as years go on and no one helps to clean the bay more bad things are going to happen. In fact, it’s fair to say that it’s already happening too soon, and it’s not fair that I have to pay when I get older for the millions of mistakes that elders make causing a financial and environmental debt. Also we will lose all of our money for the Bay if that happens. Then the Bay will die off causing us and millions to be ill. If we don’t want that to happen then I suggest that we get our game on and you, my County Council people, MUST pass the stormwater bill! Also I suggest that all that kids in the whole county step up and force adults to do what is right.

It is our watershed too!

If we don’t act fast then you and everyone else will suffer. I dare you to step up and if not now, then when? And like we say on my football team step up or step down! We need to pass this bill!

Thank you for your time and understanding!

Sincerely Keaghan Muller

Keaghan is 10 . . . . His mother is Captain Diana Muller, the South RiverKeeper, so Keaghan has lots of exposure to the water quality problems of the county, but he’s definitely got his own ideas. . . . 

Thanks Keaghan — we all really heard you. . . and we’ll make sure the County Council remembers.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND

At last some real support from the World Bank. . . . 

Begin forwarded message:


From: john peter  <john_peter8@citromail.hu>
Date: December 6, 2011 7:09:31 PM EST
Subject: INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND.

( I.M.F ) Head Office
#155,ACCRA-GHANA
P.O. Box 3031.
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND.
REF:-XVGNN82010

  
Dear Fund Beneficiary,

 This is to intimate you of a very important information which will be of a great help to redeem you from all the difficulties you have been experiencing in getting your long over due payment, due to excessive demand for money from you by both corrupt Bank officials and Courier Companies after which your fund remain unpaid to you.

  
I am Mr. JOHN PETERSON, a highly placed official of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). It may interest you to know that reports have reached our office by so many correspondences on the uneasy way which people like you are treated by Various Banks and Courier Companies/ Diplomat across Europe to Africa and Asia /London Uk. We have decided to put a stop to that and that is why I was appointed to handle your transaction here in GHANA.

All Governmental and Non-Governmental prostates, NGOs, Finance Companies, Banks, Security Companies and Courier companies which have been in contact with you of late have been instructed to back off from your transaction and you have been advised NOT to respond to them anymore since the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is now directly in charge of your payment.

 Your name appeared in our payment schedule list of beneficiaries that will receive their funds in this first quarter payment of the year because we only transfer fund twice in a year according to our banking regulation. We apologize for the delay of your payment and please stop communicating with any office now and attention to our office payment accordingly.

 Now your new Payment, United nation Approval No; UN5685P, White House Approved No: WH44CV, Reference No.-35460021, Allocation No: 674632 Password No: 339331, Pin Code No: 55674 and your Certificate of Merit Payment No: 103, Released Code No: 0763; Immediate (IMF) Telex confirmation No: -1114433; Secret Code No: XXTN013. Your part payment inheritance fund is USD$10.7Million. Having received these vital payment numbers, therefore you are qualified now to received and confirm your payment with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) African Region immediately within the next 168hrs. We assure you that your payment will get to you as long as you follow my directives and instructions. We have decided to give you a CODE, THE CODE IS: 601. Please, any time you receive a mail with the name Mr.JOHN PETERSON, check if there is CODE (601) if the code is not writen, please delete the massage from your box!

 You are hereby advised NOT to remit further payment to any institutions with respect to your transaction as your fund will be transferred to you directly from our source.

 I hope this is clear. Any action contrary to this instruction is at your own risk. Respond to this e-mail on  with immediate effect and we shall give you further details on how your fund will be released.

 Also call me as soon as you send the e-mail so that you will be given an immediate response:Direct Hot-line,

 Regards,

 Mr. JOHN PETERSON (I.M.F)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Tsunami

Dear Sailing Magazine  — 

I haven’t been able to register on your web site, or to get my comment on his article itself accepted, but here’s a comment for Robert Perry, regarding his design for the Class A Anguillan sloop, Tsunami (copy below)-– feel free to publish if you want:

TSUNAMI: An Anguillan Sloop by Robert Perry

What next? 

Bruce Farr lives down the street, maybe we can get him to do a design with dual rudders or an open stern?

There are few enough local boatwrights who can design and build these classic work boats — not sure I want to see West Indian sloop racing go the way of North American boat racing — a globalised sport reserved for only the few with the biggest billfolds. 

When we first saw the Anguillan sloops in 1973, it was the year after Emil Gumbs had started a revolution by commissioning a NEVISIAN boatwright from Charlestown to build Saga Boy, and Bertie Richardson lept to the challenge the next year with Saga Girl. Bertie’s father, Reuben, who ran a rum shop on the beach in Sandy Ground, asked us to try to convince Bertie to use traditional granite stones for ballast, rather than iron rails, because the stones were natural features that worked with the boat, rather than the artificial iron rails. We abstained from the debate.

That was also the last year that anyone used canvas sails. The next August Monday races, the last holdout, a yellow and green boat called Peace and Love, I think, showed up with a brand new dacron sail. Rumor had it that unbeknownst to his wife, the owner used the rent money to buy the sail, and other boats were generous in letting Peace and Love — still about the slowest boat in the fleet — win one or two of the August Monday races. 

Contrary to Bob Perry’s description of a Le Mans start — back in those days the boats used to start from a windward shore, where a line was anchored to the beach by a crew of a dozen or two local folks, while the boat held offshore with sails raised, and would drop the line at the start. We never saw as many as 22 crew — more likely 12 to 15. 

Guess maybe I won’t ask Bruce Farr to design next year’s boat, after all. 

==============================================

BOATS Perry on Design

Tsunami

Anguilla racing sloop

I  get some unusual design jobs. There was the submarine job. The 116-foot-long Fautasi (super canoe) for the Samoan village was interesting, as was my trip to Samoa. Over a year ago my phone rang one afternoon and the gentleman calling asked, in a deep sonorous voice, if I would be willing to design a Class A racing sloop to compete in the Anguilla races. I asked where Anguilla was then said I’d be happy to design the boat. I had no idea what an Anguilla Class A boat looked like and I had no idea of the class rules. But it sounded like an interesting project and I don’t get asked to design many racing boats so I jumped at the chance. My new client, Mr. Carl Richardson, directed me to some website where I could find videos of the boats racing.

Anguilla is in the eastern part of the Caribbean in the Lesser Antilles in the Leeward Islands. It’s only 39 square miles big but it is very beautiful and appears to be a wonderful place to vacation. The sailboat racing in their local classes is intense and very competitive. The Class A rules are loose. The boat cannot have an LOA greater than 28 feet. Ballast must be internal and the keel must be a “full keel” type. That’s about as specific a set of rules as I ever got. The boats are crewed with between 14 and 22 men and there is a good chance some of the crew will be asked to swim ashore once the weather mark is rounded. Ballast is in the form of heavy iron bars that the crew carries from side to side with each tack.

After watching the videos of the boats sailing it occurred to me that maybe the boats could be faster with less crew and less rig. As you can see by the sailplan the rig is very unusual and huge. I suggested this to Carl but he was adamant that we stay with the big rig and big crew. Obviously, while the written rules were few there was the spirit of the class that has to be adhered to. I designed the boat to displace 11,556 pounds with full crew and movable ballast for a D/L of 236. I was not sure how much of the “full keel” I could cut away and still stay within the spirit of the rule so I gave my client a few options and one was accepted. Unfortunately the local builder who built the boat under a shade tree took some liberties with my lines after I provided full-size Mylar patterns, but that’s what happens when you are dealing with an old traditional model and an old traditional builder, Mr. David Hodge. Construction is white pine planking on plywood frames with West epoxy.

I begged my client to let me design a more modern rig for the boat but in the end tradition won the day. The boom I drew is 34 feet long. But I suspect the boom they built is 38 feet long. I’m just not sure. There was not a lot of communication during the build. As drawn the SA/D is 35.5. I have watched several videos of these boats racing and videos of Tsunami racing but I have yet to see a jibe. I imagine it is action-packed. There are no winches on the boats.

There are about a dozen of these Class A sloops racing. The start is a Le Mans type with the boats anchored close to the beach, making shoal draft a premium. My client would like me to come down for the next racing season. I am anxiously waiting for some race results.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Three things you can do for the Environment

P1030286

Wading on an unaccustomed beach during low tide, 8 November 2011

1)   Support County Councilman Chris Trumbauer
Ok, make that FOUR things you can do for the environment.

2) Support Chris Trumbauer’s Stormwater Restoration Fund (Bill Number 79-11) 
The bill was introduced at the County Council on Monday, 7 November 2011.

3) Pay your dues to your local River Keeper group. . . 
If you don’t know any, check the web site of the Water Keeper Alliance, or better yet, just join the South River Federation 
— one of the most effective watershed groups in the entire Chesapeake Bay Watershed.

4) If you live near these deer, on the South River, make a special contribution to the 
Watershed Restoration projects of the South River Federation. 
It’s expensive work — one small watershed will cost a million dollars to repair damages inflicted over the past 50+ years — but it’s absolutely necessary if we want to be able to swim and fish safely in our local streams and rivers. It literally is one of the best investments you can make. 

S
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Not a Bad Morning to be Kayaking

Photo

Sent from my iPhone

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Who Woulda Guessed? The 1% Earned It . . . .

From Ezra Klein’s blog at Washington Post.com


Commenter ToddinHB asks:

How many of the 1% inherited their money, made their fortunes with a sizable trust fund, or made their money manipulating the financial system, without adding anything to the general welfare of the state?

New York University economist Edward Wolff has done the best work I’ve seen on the contribution of inheritance to wealth inequality, and his latest paper, coauthored with the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Maury Gittleman, is chock full of relevant data on the matter. In 2007, the last year Wolff and Gittleman look at, wealth transfers (mainly inheritances, but also including gifts) made up, on average, 14.7 percent of the total wealth of the 1 percent (more specifically, the top 1 percent in terms of wealth). Interestingly, inheritance’s share has declined over time. In 1992, 27 percent of the wealth of the top 1 percent came from wealth transfers.

Wolff and Gittleman also find that because wealth transfers generally make up a bigger portion of the wealth of poor and middle-class people, they actually reduce wealth inequality, in aggregate. “Our simulations show that eliminating inheritances either in full or in part actually increases overall wealth inequality and, in particular, sharply reduces the share of the bottom 40 percent of the wealth distribution,” they write. So while there’s no doubting that the rich are inheriting a lot of money — 14.7 percent of the wealth of the top 1 percent isn’t nothing, after all — it remains the case that inheritance does not increase wealth inequality.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Good News; Bad News

from the Southern Maryland newspapers on line:

 Fee hike proposed for those on septic tanks

Money would upgrade state’s sewer plants

advertisement

If you flush a toilet in the state of Maryland, you are supposed to be paying a fee to do so.

Those on public sewer pay $2.50 a month, or $30 a year, to the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund. Those on their own septic systems pay $30 a year on their property taxes.

A workgroup of a state task force on sustainable growth and wastewater disposal has recommended the septic system annual fee be increased to $60 next year and to $90 by 2015. Sixty percent of people in St. Mary’s County use septic tanks.

There are 420,000 septic systems in the state, according to the Maryland Department of the Environment.

Most of this “flush tax” money helps pay to upgrade sewer plants and replace failing septic systems.

The proposed hike in fees “would be used to address the remainder” of sewer plants “that haven’t been done yet,” said Jay Apperson, spokesman for the Maryland Department of the Environment.

By the end of September 2010, the monthly sewer plant fee had raised $297 million to be distributed to the state’s 67 sewer plants that discharge into the bay’s tributaries.

The current fee will fall $530 million short of the $1.5 billion it will take to upgrade all of the plants, according to the latest report by the bay restoration fund advisory committee.

Now the focus is on increasing the yearly fee on septic systems. “The word on the street that we’re hearing is perhaps doubled or tripled,” said Jacquelyn Meiser, director of the St. Mary’s County Metropolitan Commission.

Commission President Jack Russell (D) said he heard about the recommendation to increase that fee, but said, “All this stuff is so very vague.”

“The task force will eventually vote on the recommendations it will send to the governor,” Apperson said, by Dec. 1.

In St. Mary’s County, the design to upgrade the treatment process at the Marlay-Taylor Water Reclamation Facility in Lexington Park is 65 percent completed, Meiser told the county commissioners Tuesday.

Construction could begin by next summer and would take two years. The cost estimate is $35.5 million, covered by the Navy paying $7.1 million, a loan of $16.8 million from the Maryland Department of the Environment and $11.6 million from the bay restoration fee.

By getting the design in earlier than other sewer plants in the state, that bay restoration money should be secured easily, said Joe St. Clair, chairman of the MetCom board.

The Marlay-Taylor plant collects and treats sewage from Lexington Park, California, Great Mills, Piney Point, St. George Island, St. Mary’s City and Callaway, serving more than 37,000 people.

A state report in January said 16 plants in Maryland have already upgraded the treatment process from biological nutrient removal to enhanced nutrient removal. That is the upgrade planned for the Marlay-Taylor plant.

Nitrogen and phosphorus enter the Chesapeake Bay from three primary sources sewer plants and urban and agricultural runoff.

Nitrogen and phosphorus fuel algae blooms in the water, which decay. The bacteria breaking down the algae deprive the water of oxygen for other marine life.

While Marlay-Taylor will be upgraded, its capacity won’t be expanded. The plant can handle 6 million gallons of sewage a day, or 24,000 sewer hookups. One hookup is expected to produce 250 gallons a day, which is the statewide standard, Meiser said.

The rate of growth in St. Mary’s has slowed in recent years and some hookups previously allocated for future development have been relinquished, said David Chapman, planner with the St. Mary’s County Department of Land Use and Growth Management.

“For the short term, we don’t see a heavy demand for allocation,” he said. There are 1,700 hookups remaining at Marlay-Taylor.

jbabcock@somdnews.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Beautiful Sunrise this Morning!

See Chris Trumbauer’s sunny greeting at his Facebook page:

Marred only by this sunken sailboat in Church Creek that is now deeper in the muck than before, and will get REALLY hard to manage when we have a bit of a storm and the boat tips over. Too bad no one in County or State government gives a damn about removing it before even more damage is done.

P1030201sm
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Strange Object Seen in Church Creek

Hmm — maybe it’s the boat that sank there several weeks ago??

P1030078

The one that had these decals so DNR could get the owner to move it???

. . .  or will it stay there forever??

P1020902P1020904

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Poor Ryland Hammered by HOUMOUNGOUS Fine: 8/100’s of 1% of last year’s loss!

. . .  and the bottom line is that Virginia get $11,000. . . 

Ryland Homes Fined for Polluting Chesapeake Bay

October 14, 2011 10:53 pmBy: 

logoThe Ryland Group Inc., one of the nation’s largest homebuilders, will pay a civil penalty of $625,000 to several states to resolve alleged Clean Water Act violations at its construction sites, including sites located in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, the Department of Justice and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced.

Ryland will also invest in compliance programs to improve employee training and increase management oversight at all current and future construction sites.   The company is also required to inspect its current and future construction sites routinely to minimize storm water runoff from sites.

Without proper onsite pollution controls, sediment-laden storm water runoff from construction sites can flow to the nearest waterway and degrade water quality. EPA estimates the settlement will prevent millions of pounds of sediment from entering U.S. waterways every year.  In addition, storm water can pick up other pollutants, including concrete washout, paint, used oil, solvents, and trash.

Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli applauded the EPA’s action.

“When the EPA works within the bounds of its authority to enforce environmental regulations to keep contaminated storm water from flowing into the Chesapeake Bay, I support its efforts to protect Virginia’s natural resources,” said Cuccinelli.

The government complaint, filed simultaneously with the settlement agreement in the U.S. District Court in Charlotte, N.C., alleges a pattern of violations that was discovered through site inspections and by reviewing documentation submitted by Ryland. The alleged violations include failure to obtain permits until after construction began, failing to obtain permits at all, or failing to comply with permit requirements at sites where Ryland did obtain permits. Alleged permit violations include not developing complete storm water pollution prevention plans, failure to conduct adequate inspections, and failure to install or implement adequate storm water controls or practices.

The Clean Water Act requires permits for the discharge of storm water runoff.   Ryland’s permits require that construction sites have controls in place to prevent pollution from being discharged with storm water into nearby waterways.   These controls include safeguards such as silt fences, phased site grading, and sediment basins to prevent common construction contaminants from entering waterways.

The settlement requires Ryland to obtain all required permits; develop site-specific pollution prevention plans for each construction site; conduct additional site inspections beyond those required by storm water regulations; and document and promptly correct any problems detected. The company must properly train construction managers and contractors on storm water requirements and designate trained staff for each site.   Ryland must also submit national compliance summary reports to EPA based on its quarterly management oversight inspections and reviews.

Seven states have joined the settlement. Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Nevada, and Virginia will receive a portion of the $625,000 penalty.   The settlement also includes sites in California, Georgia, Kentucky, Minnesota, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas.  Virginia’s portion of the settlement is $11,241.

“Although Virginia is only receiving a small portion of the financial settlement, this case was more about ensuring appropriate storm water controls at construction sites and preventing future damage to the bay,” said Cuccinelli.

The consent decree, lodged in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, is subject to a 30-day public comment period and approval by the federal court.   Once notice is published in the Federal Register, a copy of the consent decree will be available on the Justice Department website at www.justice.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.
 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment