[From a friend’s blog in the Seychelles, based on an article in Australia . . guess that globalisation thing is working. . .

hmmm — so maybe we should tell planners at the State, County and City level that they are legally liable for permitting development that might be reasonably expected to be flooded within the reasonable life of the project . . .


From: My Sunshine Coast

23 November 2009

Australia’s coastal councils face the possibility of costly legal actions as a result of recent changes to projected sea level rise, according to the National Sea Change Taskforce.

The Taskforce, which represents non-metropolitan coastal councils in all states, is advising member councils they will need to take into account the revised sea level rise scenario of 1.1m, which was announced in a new government report on climate change released last week.

Alan Stokes, the executive director of the Taskforce, said the process of approving development applications in coastal areas at potential risk of inundation could be thrown into disarray by recent changes in projected sea level rise.

“Development applications that were approved a week ago based on a projected sea level rise of 0.8m in Victoria, or 0.9m in NSW could already be shown to be based on scientific projections that are now redundant, exposing the consent authority to potential legal liability,” he said.

“The nation’s coastal councils need a greater measure of legal protection in order to provide some certainty in deciding development applications in areas at risk of sea level rise.”

Mr Stokes said it was only last year that some states were basing planning decisions on a projected sea level rise of 0.3m or 0.38m. “The release of the Federal Government report Climate Change Risks to Australia’s Coasts last Saturday has changed all that,” he said.

“No consent authority in the nation can now argue they were unaware of a potential sea level rise of 1.1m by the year 2100. That now appears to have become the default scenario, with some local variation, which planners around Australia will need to take into account when considering any coastal development application.”

“This is a national issue affecting all coastal councils which could have significant impacts on property owners seeking to proceed with developments in areas at perceived risk. It is an issue that urgently requires clarification, as recommended in the report of the coastal Inquiry by the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Climate Change.”

A leading environmental lawyer supported the need for coastal councils to examine the nature and extent of potential climate change impacts very carefully when considering coastal development applications.

Andrew Beatty a partner specialising in environment law with the law firm Baker & McKenzie said there was no doubt that failure to consider climate change impacts when making coastal planning decisions leaves councils exposed to the risk of costly legal actions.

“These cases are complicated by the fact that climate change impacts on coastal land do not occur immediately or in predictable ways,” he said. “Each case will turn on its own facts.”
Posted by Rolph Payet…

About Bruce

Work for sustainable development of small islands and the Chesapeake Bay; ex-Peace Corps (Volunteer and staff) in LA & Caribbean; cruised Caribbean on S/Y Meander for three years; like small tropical islands, French canals, Umbria, Tasmania, and NZ. Married 52 years to the late Kincey Burdett Potter (see President of the now-sunsetting Island Resources Foundation.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.