Large Marine Ecosystem Governance Presentations at Woodrow Wilson Center

Large Marine Ecosystem Governance Presentations atWoodrow

Governance of Marine Ecosystem-BasedManagement: A Comparative Analysis
September 29, 2008 : 12:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.
Nygiel B. Armada, Fisheries Management Advisor, FisheriesImproved for Sustainable Harvests (FISH) Project, Tetra Tech
Patrick Christie, Assistant Professor, School of MarineAffairs and Jackson School of International Studies, University ofWashington
Robin Mahon, Professor ofMarine Affairs and Director of the Centre for Resource Management andEnvironmental Studies (CERMES), University of the West Indies,Barbados
Alan White, Senior Scientist, Global Marine Initiative,The Nature Conservancy

“Frequently, we forget that environmental management is all aboutinstitutions and governance, and the decisions and trade-offs that wemake,” said the University of Washington’s Patrick Christie at”Governance of Marine Ecosystem-Based Management: A ComparativeAnalysis,” a September 29, 2008, event sponsored by the WilsonCenter’s Environmental Change and Security Program (ECSP). “And ofcourse they need to be informed by ecological principles as well. Butwhen it comes down to it, you’re managing individuals, institutions,[and] budgets.” Christie believes that as more and more marinespecies move dangerously close to extinction-whether fromoverfishing, pollution, or habitat destruction-ecosystem-basedmanagement (EBM), which governs ecosystems according to ecologicalrather than political boundaries, offers the best approach to marineconservation. This meeting was the final event in ECSP’s “Fishingfor a Secure Future” series.

Decentralizing EBM

For Alan White of The Nature Conservancy, the Coastal ResourceManagement Project (CRMP), initiated by the U.S. Agency forInternational Development in 1996, exemplifies EBM’s success.Working in 111 coastal municipalities in the Philippines and coveringapproximately one-sixth of the country’s coastline, CRMP helpedmanagers of municipal fisheries and marine protected areas (MPAs)collaborate with coastal law enforcement agencies to restore fishpopulations. EBM can be achieved, argued White, by allowing localmunicipalities to control simple regulatory schemes-so long as theyare simultaneously sharing information with larger-scale networks.However, “the local governments have to be the ones to pay for this;they can’t be dependent on foreign donor projects or even largeNGOs. It’s got to be sustained through the mechanism of governanceand governments in those areas,” he said.

The Coral Triangle Initiative (CTI) regional action plan, drafted bythe CTI’s six members-Indonesia, East Timor, the Philippines,Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, and the Solomon Islands-is designed tomake ecosystem-based fisheries management “more mainstream in theregion,” said White. Among the many factors decreasing fishpopulations in the region are illegal and commercial fishing, chemicalpoisoning, industrial pollution, coral bleaching, typhoons, andaquarium fishing, he noted, and to effectively address these problems,local municipalities and larger-scale actors must coordinate theirstrategies.

Curbing Illegal Fishing in the Philippines

Tetra Tech’s Nygiel Armada explained that the Fisheries Improved forSustainable Harvests (FISH) Project in the Philippines’ Danajon Bankecosystem demonstrates how improving control mechanisms can combatillegal and commercial fishers’ activities. The FISH Project focuseson improving control mechanisms, including the network of MPAs;species-specific management; gear restrictions; size limits on fish;registration and licensing; and zoning of fishing and wateractivities. Strengthening these mechanisms and combining them withcross-cutting initiatives such as information, education, andcommunication campaigns; better policies; and collaboration with lawenforcement agencies led to more fish.

“Governance is only as strong as your weakest link,” emphasizedArmada. The weakest municipalities-those that allowed illegalfishing practices to continue and failed to enforce controlmechanisms-weakened overall gains. To sustain fish stocks andimprove governance, all localities must work together to enforcecontrol mechanisms.

Marine Governance, Large and Small

“As scale increases, and complexity increases, and control andpotential for coordination become less feasible, there’s really [a]need to pay increasing attention to the context within whichgovernance is taking place,” maintained Robin Mahon of theUniversity of the West Indies, who studies the Caribbean large marineecosystem. As Mahon argued, “policy cycles at all levels areimportant because different types of decisions take place at eachlevel.”

By Will Rogers
Edited by Rachel Weisshaar

--

      35 Years of Environmental Service toSmall Tropical Islands

      Island Resources Foundation   Fone  202/265-9712 
      1718 “P” St NW, #T-4         fax   202/232-0748
      Washington, DC 20036   Potter cell: 1-443-454-9044
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —- — — — –
Subscribe to environmental e-mail groups at<http://www.irf.org/help/email.php >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 
Blogs athttp://pottersweal.wordpress.com/; twitter: brucepotter
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dining and Dressing Hints: Coudersport

After walking about the village of Coudersport last Saturday afternoon (see the pictures at //tinyurl.com/5b94rt ) — we decided to splurge and had dinner at what had been described as the fanciest restaurant in town. Food was okay and service was good, especially considering that the main dining room was filled with a Knights of Columbus dinner of some sort, featuring young men in jackets and ties and young women (all apparently high school age) in formal-type dresses — a few with corsages.

[In the Coudersport pictures you may have noticed two women walking into the China Garden Restaurant — in the window, you can see a table full of their equally dressed up friends, already eating.]

The picture attached shows the place mat we were provided at dinner on Saturday night in the Crittenden. Note especially the ad on top for the Mad Tatter. . . . . Ms. Ayers at the Frosty Hollow said the Sweden Valley Inn, just up the road at the intersection of Route 44 and Route Six, had good food.

have fun . . . .

Bruce

— —————————————————
Bruce Potter
1818 Woods Road
Annapolis, MD 21401

home landline: 410-280-6254; home fax: same
CELL –>> 1-443-454-9044
DC Office:
Island Resources Foundation

1718 P Street NW, #T-4, Washington, DC 20036

202/265-9712
off fax: 202/232-0748
STT Office:
340/775-6225
STT fax: 340/779-2022

E-mail: URL:
FLICKR:
bpotter1942
and Blogs at:
http://pottersweal.wordpress.com

http://brucepotter.wordpress.com/
—————————————————————-
“Ignoranti quem portem petat, nullus suus ventas est”
“If one does not know to which port one is sailing…..no wind is favorable”
– Seneca the Younger (3BC-65AD)
—————————————————————-

Pa172123_crittenden

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Opportunity to Influence Assistance Request for CC & Biodiversity in the Caribbean

Following is a message that was just posted on the CCCCC web site regional forum at

http://www.caribbeanclimate.bz/e107_plugins/forum/forum_post.php?nt.5

or, the easy way —

http://tinyurl.com/4ghpcr

Posted: Tue Oct 07 2008, 08:53PM

from the web site at WWW.CANARI.ORG/MACARTHURCLIMATECHANGE.HTML —

[The results of a Conference on Climate Change Models for the Caribbean, held at the Normandie Hotel in Port-of-Spain TRINIDAD, by CANARI. This page REQUESTS YOUR INFORMED INPUT, and provides a down-loadable form for that purpose, plus three good final reports from the conference.]

Climate Change and Biodiversity in the Caribbean

Climate Change and Biodiversity in the Caribbean developing a regional research agenda

Over the past 18 months, the Caribbean Natural Resources Institute (CANARI) has been implementing a project entitled Climate Change and Biodiversity in the Caribbean (CCBIC) under funding from the John T. and Catherine D. MacArthur Foundation.

The objectives of the project are:

* to increase understanding and consensus on what is known about the predicted climate change trends and their impact on biodiversity in the islands of the Caribbean
* to identify gaps in regional knowledge and develop a research agenda to address these gaps and to identify the capacities that need to be developed to implement the agenda.

The first stage of the project has been a desk review of the current state of knowledge on the impacts of climate change on biodiversity in the region and the related research capacities. Working groups were established for this purpose and the following draft reports have been prepared:

1. Climate change models and scenarios for the islands of the Caribbean
2. Climate change impacts on marine and coastal biodiversity in the islands of the Caribbean
3. Climate change impacts on terrestrial biodiversity in the islands of the Caribbean.

We are now making these reports available for stakeholder to review and comment on if they so wish. The reports will be finalised at meetings of the Steering Committee in September so we would be grateful if you could provide feedback by 27 August 2008 to Hema Seeramsingh at -email- on any errors of fact or substantive omissions regarding research currently underway that you identify.

If you know of anyone else who would be interested or can assist in the review of the attached working group documents, please direct them to the website http://www.canari.org/macarthurclimatechange.html .

All of the responses that we receive will be noted and synthesised into a document that will be reviewed by the Steering Committee and a final regional project meeting in September and subsequently incorporated into the final versions of the Working Group reports which will be disseminated in November. The findings of all the Working Groups will also be summarised in a shorter document, which we intend to translate into Spanish and French.

For further information or queries, please contact Sarah McIntosh at -email-.

* CCBIC – Final Draft Working Group I – GCC Scenarios and Models

CCBIC – Final Draft Working Group II – Coastal and Marine Biodiversity

CCBIC – Final Draft Working Group III – Terrestrial Biodiversity

CCBIC – Comments Template

— —
35 Years of Environmental Service to Small Tropical Islands

Island Resources Foundation
Fone
202/265-9712
1718 “P” St NW, # T-4
fax
202/232-0748
Washington, DC 20036
Potter cell: 1-443-454-9044
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –
Subscribe to environmental e-mail groups at
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Blogs at http://pottersweal.wordpress.com/; twitter: brucepotter
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pew proposes Coral Sea Heritage Park

This article from the “Official MPA Blog” at

http://officialmpa.blogspot.com/2008/09/pew-proposes-coral-sea-heritage-park.html

Pew proposes Coral Sea Heritage Park

  On 10th September 2008, the Pew Environment Group and partners launched a report which calls for a no-take oceanic park in the Coral Sea >covering one million km2. Extending east from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, the Park >would encompass Australia’s maritime boundary with Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and New Caledonia. The Coral Sea is an Australian ecological and historical treasure. It has more than 25 spectacular coral reefs and abundant wildlife including sharks and rays, turtles, whales and dolphins, seabirds and majestic >pelagic fish such as tuna, marlin and swordfish. The Coral Sea also has a rich maritime history. In May 1942, it was the site of a naval battle that turned the tide of World War II in the Pacific. Many trading ships were reduced to shipwrecks on its remote reefs and atolls.

  The Pew Envrionment Group says that Coral Sea offers the Australian Government an unparalleled opportunity to protect a vast area of the world’s tropical marine environment and an area of great cultural significance. The initiative is part of a collaborative effort, Global Ocean Legacy, managed by the Pew Environment Group, supported by the Oak Foundation, the Robertson Foundation and the Sandler Family Supporting >Foundation.

  The Coral Sea project works with Australian environment groups including the Australian Conservation Foundation, Australian Marine Conservation Society and the Cairns and Far North Environment Centre. The proposal is supported by the Australian National Maritime Museum, the American Australian Association and the Battle for Australia Commemoration National Council.

Pew: http://www.globaloceanlegacy.org/coralsea/


35 Years of Environmental Service to Small Tropical Islands

Island Resources Foundation
Fone
202/265-9712
1718 “P” St NW, # T-4
fax
202/232-0748
Washington, DC 20036
Potter cell: 1-443-454-9044
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –
Subscribe to environmental e-mail groups at
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Blogs at http://pottersweal.wordpress.com/; twitter: brucepotter
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Here’s where we went

Two good places to visit in Alaska.
— —
35 Years of Environmental Service to Small Tropical Islands

Island Resources Foundation
Fone
202/265-9712
1718 “P” St NW, # T-4
fax
202/232-0748
Washington, DC 20036
Potter cell: 1-443-454-9044
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –
Subscribe to environmental e-mail groups at
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Blogs at http://pottersweal.wordpress.com/; twitter: brucepotter
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

P1010313

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Approved Footware for Alaska

Since our vacation to SE Alaska, many people have asked if you really need knee-high rubber boots to get around — this is the authoritative answer.

Alaska_footware

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Major Opinion Piece in Washington Post Outlook

The lead article in the Washington Post OUTLOOK section for Sunday, August 31 at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/29/AR2008082902337.html

Elizabeth Becker will be on-line on Tuesday, September 2nd to answer questions about this article — see the URL above for details.

——

Don’t Go There
The whole world has the travel bug. And it’s ravaging the planet.

By Elizabeth Becker
Sunday, August 31, 2008; B01

Did you manage to find someplace for your vacation this summer where you could get away from it all and immerse yourself in nature, or whatever it is that you like to do with a free week or two?

I didn’t think so.

It’s getting harder and harder. The world has shrunk — and the tourist legions have exploded. The streets of Paris and Venice are so crowded that you can barely move. Cruise ships are filling harbors and disgorging hordes of day trippers the world over. Towering hotels rise in ever-greater numbers along once pristine and empty beaches.

Thanks to globalization and cheap transportation, there aren’t many places where you can travel today to avoid the masses of adventure- or relaxation-seekers who seem to alight at every conceivable site. I used to love going back to my old haunt in a Himalayan hill station where, as a student in India in 1970, I climbed those steep, silent paths and watched langur monkeys swinging in the trees outside my window. No longer. Now, Moussurie is chock-a-block with tourist lodges, garbage and noise; the monkeys are fleeing.

This problem goes far beyond a veteran traveler’s complaint that things aren’t the way they used to be, or annoyance at sharing the Eiffel Tower or the Taj Mahal with thousands of other photo-snapping tourists loudly asking questions in languages the locals don’t understand. What’s happening today is of another magnitude.

The places we love are rapidly disappearing. Global tourism today is not only a major industry — it’s nothing short of a planet-threatening plague. It’s polluting land and sea, destroying wildlife and natural habitat and depleting energy and natural resources. From Asia to Africa, look-alike resorts and spas are replacing and undermining local culture, and the international quest for vacation houses is forcing local residents out of their homes. It’s giving rise to official corruption, wealth inequities and heedless competition. It’s even contributing to human rights violations, especially through the scourge of sex tourism.

Look at Cambodia. The monumental temples at Angkor and the beaches on the Gulf of Thailand have made that country a choice destination, especially for Asians, who spent $1 billion there last year. But the foundations of those celebrated temples are in danger of sinking as the 856,000 tourists who every year crowd into Siem Reap, the nearby town of 85,000, drain the surrounding water table.

Meanwhile, Cambodia’s well-connected elite has moved to cash in on the bonanza, conspiring with police and the courts to evict peasants from their rural landscape, which is being transformed by high-end resorts catering to wealthy visitors. Cambodia’s League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights is compiling files that bulge with photographs of thatched-roof houses being burned down while police restrain their traumatized owners. And at night along the riverfront in the capitol of Phnom Penh, the sight of aging Western men holding hands with Cambodian girls young enough to be their granddaughters is ugly evidence of the rampant sex-tourism trade.

All this came as a shock to me. I’ve been writing about Cambodia for more than 35 years, but I never considered tourism there a serious subject. But when I went back last November, I couldn’t avoid the issue. In three short years, tourism had transformed the country. In every interview, the conversation wandered toward tourism, its potential and its abuses. When I went up to Siem Reap, I found the great hall temple of Angkor as crowded, as a colleague said, as Filene’s Basement during a sale. Forget tapping into any sense of the divine.

I began researching the global tourism industry and why journalists have allowed it to fly under the radar. Newspapers, the Web and the airwaves are filled with stories celebrating travel; few examine the effects of mass tourism. As Nancy Newhouse, the former New York Times travel editor, told me: “We never did the ten worst [places to visit], only the ten best.”

Most people can’t imagine that tourism could be a global menace. Even the word “tourism” sounds lightweight. And travel has always been surrounded by an aura of romance. For centuries, beginning with the first tourists on holy pilgrimages, travel has been about adventure and discovery and escape from the pressures of daily life.

It wasn’t until the end of the 20th century that tourism was added to the list of industries measured in the U.S. gross domestic product. And the results were a revelation: About $1.2 trillion of the $13 trillion U.S. economy is derived from tourism.

Tourism has become the stealth industry of the global era. According to the United Nations, the international tourist count in 1960, at the dawn of the modern era of air travel, was 25 million. By 1970, the figure was up to 165 million. Last year, about 898 million people traveled the globe, and the international tourism industry earned $7 trillion. (And those figures don’t include people who vacation in their own countries.)

The U.N. World Tourism Organization was established as a special agency five years ago with the twin goals of keeping track of the tourism industry and figuring out how poor countries, in particular, can take advantage of the tourist boom without causing their own ruin. Geoffrey Lipman, the assistant secretary general of the new organization, has spent his life studying the industry. “Tourism,” he told me, “is arguably the largest cluster of industrial sectors in the world” and needs to be included in any international discussions about eliminating poverty or protecting the environment. If properly conducted — maintaining respect for a country’s environment and culture, providing local jobs and a market for local goods — tourism, the United Nations believes, is easily the best way for a poor nation to earn foreign currency.

There are several promising examples of this philosophy at work. The nonprofit British National Trust offers tourist rentals in restored cottages and historic mansions and then uses the money to buy more land and properties to preserve and protect. The African nation of Namibia, meanwhile, has created what it calls “community-based tourism,” which manages more than 25 million acres of wildlife preserves, opening much of the land to tourism — hunting or photo safaris, birding and white-water rafting — that employs local residents and has dramatically reduced poaching.

Most of the tourism industry, however, is heading in the opposite direction. TOURISM IS NOW RESPONSIBLE FOR 5 PERCENT OF THE WORLD’S POLLUTION, ACCORDING TO A RECENT STUDY. Cruise ships are one of the biggest culprits. These floating hotels create three times more pollution per passenger mile than airplanes. YEARS OF CRUISES HAVE HELPED SPOIL THE WATER OF THE CARIBBEAN, WHICH, ACCORDING TO THE UNITED NATIONS, ABSORBS HALF THE WASTE DUMPED IN THE WORLD’S OCEANS. Now these ships are venturing into already fragile polar waters. Last year, Norway banned all cruise ships from visiting its region of the Arctic Circle.

Beach erosion has been swift. After the South Asian tsunami in 2004, fishermen were told to move their homes away from the beaches, but luxury hotel chains with clout were allowed to rebuild near the water’s edge. In the United States, the upswing in violent hurricanes hasn’t put a dent in the number of vacation homes being built by the sea. “ESSENTIALLY EVERY TROPICAL ISLAND IS IN DANGER,” THE NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY’S JONATHAN TOURTELLOT TOLD ME.

In poorer nations, unregulated tourist developments have put unbearable strains on scant resources, especially water. High-end tourists often waste more water in a day with multiple daily showers and toilet flushes than some local families use in a month.

Then there’s the fear that over time, major tourist destinations will become virtual ghost towns. Residents of Venice went on strike last spring to block licenses for more hotels; the city of canals is now so expensive that many locals have been pushed out, helping cut the permanent population nearly in half. This summer, the British government issued a report on rural living that included a serious warning that the rich were buying so many vacation or second homes in the countryside that many local residents couldn’t afford to live in their villages anymore.

But of all the ills brought on by mass travel, none is as odious as sex tourism. The once-hidden trade is now open and global, with ever-younger girls and boys being forced into prostitution. The Department of Justice estimates that sex tourism provides from 2 to 14 percent of the gross national incomes of countries such as Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines.

The United States has taken a lead in attempts to eliminate sex tourism, but otherwise, it has stayed out of the tourism debate, mostly viewing tourism as a private matter. Now, however, says Isabel Hill, director of the Commerce Department’s Office of Travel and Tourism Industries, the questions raised by mass tourism have become too large to ignore. She hopes that the United States, like so many European countries, will “recognize our limitations and how we have to regulate our resources.”

Still, there probably won’t be a U.S. secretary for tourism and the environment anytime soon. But don’t be surprised if the next international agreement on climate change mentions the role of tourism, or if some countries start regulating tourism along with the environment, because the two go hand-in-hand.

In fact, you’d better hope that they do — if you ever again want to find that cool vacation spot where you can get away from it all.

Elizabeth Becker, the author of “When the War Was Over: Cambodia and the Khmer Rouge Revolution,” studied media coverage of tourism at Harvard’s Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy.
— —
35 Years of Environmental Service to Small Tropical Islands

Island Resources Foundation
Fone
202/265-9712
1718 “P” St NW, # T-4
fax
202/232-0748
Washington, DC 20036
Potter cell: 1-443-454-9044
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –
Subscribe to environmental e-mail groups at
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Blogs at http://pottersweal.wordpress.com/; twitter: brucepotter
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Potemkin Climate Change Adaptation

So Shankar Vedantam has it right in this article from the Washington Post, 17 May 2008. — read the excerpt below, or the whole story with illustrations at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/16/AR2008051603612.html?hpid=moreheadlinesGo to that site to see comments posted about this issue.So if we make up the problem, in order to solve it with false actions like turning off the lights for an hour a year, we play directly into the fear mongers game.I admit that Kincey and I turned off our lights for the Earth Hour, and then looked around the neighborhood to see who else was virtuous, but I was afraid that I was only doing a census of the smart, not the virtuous.Now, if only they would make compact flourescent bulbs — or anything else — that worked, like dimming or coming on quickly or costing less than a car payment (yes, but it will still be burning 23 years after your life insurance is fully paid up!)from Grumpy Bruce

In Climate, Symbols Can Overshadow Substance

Lights-Out Event More Showy Than Practical

By Shankar VedantamWashington Post Staff WriterSaturday, May 17, 2008; A01In March of last year, the World Wildlife Fund in Australia teamed up with Leo Burnett, the multinational advertising agency that created the Marlboro Man, to come up with a new environmental campaign called Earth Hour. The idea was to get 2 million residents in Sydney to turn off all the lights in their homes for one hour. The campaign generated wide publicity, but the energy saved was small — the equivalent of taking about five cars off the city’s roads for a year.This year, Earth Hour expanded to dozens of cities around the world. The Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, the Sears Tower in Chicago and the Empire State Building in New York were among the U.S. landmarks that went dark. Many corporations signed on to burnish their green credentials. A bar in Phoenix served a drink called an ecotini — organic vodka, green tea and an edible orchid.But if everyone who participated in Earth Hour had left their lights on and instead switched to mundane, high-efficiency compact fluorescent bulbs, simple calculations show, it might have saved 1,368 times as much energy, because the bulbs would have saved energy all year.Such tension between substance and symbolism runs through the modern environmental movement. After years of conflict with climate-change deniers and a White House that has resisted mandatory efforts to address global warming, the movement has become a crusade that is partly moral statement and partly fashion statement. Earth Hour, Earth Day and the Miss Earth beauty pageant — “saving the planet, one pageant at a time” — generate lots of publicity, but they also tend to prompt people and companies to choose what looks good over what works.”There is a real problem in teaching people not to do something that appears to work, but that actually works,” said Severin Borenstein, director of the University of California’s Energy Institute, which studies ways to save energy and address climate change. Borenstein said it is hard to persuade people to do things that yield the biggest energy savings, and not necessarily the biggest returns in self-satisfaction.”It is very difficult to get people to invest in home insulation and energy efficiency, which are much more effective than putting solar panels on your roof,” he said. “Solar panels are popular because you can see you are doing something — and your neighbors can see it, too.”Leslie Aun, vice president for public relations at the World Wildlife Fund and the person with overall responsibility for running Earth Hour in the United States, agreed that getting people to turn off their lights for an hour has no discernible effect on the climate. What the event does, she said, is give neighbors an opportunity to share candlelit dinners, encourage churches to hold services about the environment and spur schoolchildren to start family conversations about what they have learned about climate change.Photos of darkened cities raise the visibility of environmental issues and make people feel empowered, Aun said. Campaigns that raise awareness through symbolic acts of personal sacrifice, she added, are not at odds with programs that produce tangible savings.”You are not going to get people to change what people do by engaging their heads; you have to engage their hearts,” she said. “You need symbols to spur action. You are not going to get people to take action unless you get them to care about the issue. You are not going to do that by pulling out the U.N. report on blah, blah, blah.”Aun stressed that the World Wildlife Fund wants to use the momentum generated by Earth Hour to advance its scientific and policy goals. And the organization handed out 1 million high-efficiency light bulbs during the event.Some 36 million Americans turned off their lights, according to the group’s publicity materials, which said that “Earth Hour inspires people all around the world to show their commitment and concern” and that the campaign is “about simple changes that will collectively make a difference.”While the idea that people who are emotionally committed can change their behavior in ways that help the planet seems appealing, a growing body of research suggests that this is not the way large-scale changes in behavior occur. The behavior of individuals, companies and nations is largely determined by structural factors, not personal choices.Once a person buys a house in the exurbs, for example (or once officials approve such a subdivision), asking people to think about the environmental costs of commuting isn’t very effective, because they are already locked into lengthy commutes. In the same way, installing motion sensors that automatically turn lights off at night produces far larger energy savings than depending on people to switch them off.”Depending on people to make a hard choice every day — don’t turn on the lights so much — is a less-promising solution than getting people to make a hard choice once,” by paying more for a high-efficiency bulb, “and thereafter having the ‘save energy’ decision be automatic,” said Travis Reynolds, a graduate student at the University of Washington in Seattle who studies how societies save energy.Reynolds’s argument is supported by the numbers: Let’s say people participating in Earth Hour have 10 100-watt light bulbs in their houses, on average. If you also assume that high-efficiency compact fluorescent bulbs last three years and use only 25 percent of the energy of conventional bulbs, you would have to persuade more than 400 people to turn off their lights for an hour to get the same energy savings as persuading one person to switch one conventional bulb to a high-efficiency bulb.Gary Flomenhoft, an economist at the University of Vermont, said his state’s decision to set up a public utility whose sole job is to reduce energy consumption produced huge savings in energy use, most of which had little to do with individual acts of virtue. The utility goes into businesses and homes and helps people figure out practical ways to save energy. As a result, Burlington today uses the same amount of energy it did in 1989.”Some people react to ethical and environmental concerns, but a vast majority of people react to price,” Flomenhoft said. “The biggest effect on people’s behavior is price. When gas reaches $4 a gallon, everyone talks about hybrids.”As gasoline prices have soared in recent months, the number of people using public transportation has risen sharply, as has interest in fuel-efficient cars. While the U.S. trends are a result of market-driven prices, many European countries have obtained the same results by raising the price of gas through taxes.The powerful role of structural factors also explains why some personal sacrifices count more than others. When it comes to turning off lights, for example, Earth Hour would have produced far more energy savings — although no cool photos of darkened cities — if it had asked people to save energy during the late afternoon, rather than at 8 p.m.That is because energy use fluctuates during the day. There are times when power companies bring more plants online, and times when plants are taken offline. In general, said Denny Ellerman, an energy and environmental economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, large energy savings are produced when energy is generated and used in a steady manner.”The more a power plant operates steadily, the more efficient it will be,” he said. “To the extent you can shift the peaks toward the valleys, you are going to improve the efficiency.”Richard Kafka, manager of transmission policy at Pepco, said usage in the Washington area is highest between 4 p.m. and 8 p.m., and lowest between midnight and 4 a.m.”Which is smarter — running on level ground or running up and down a hill?” Kafka asked. “There is a characteristic of heat engines that they are most efficient at some point, and anytime I move off that I am less efficient.”Borenstein, at the University of California, said he recently decided to take his own advice about focusing on measurable outcomes. He bought a device called a Kill-o-watt, which can measure how much energy is used by appliances and electronics, and took it around his house to look for savings.“It turned out the TV and VCR in our guest room, which is almost never used unless I am exercising, uses 17 watts all the time when it is plugged in, and it does this 24 hours a day, seven days a week,” he said. By unplugging the devices when they are not used, Borenstein found he could save nearly 150 times the amount of energy that a household with 10 100-watt light bulbs would save by turning them off for an hour.”We are not going to solve this problem with voluntary measures — it is a problem of externalities,” he said. “It is true of pollution and the way we use oil. We address tailpipe emission problems by asking people to make sure they meet emission requirements — we actually check. We have found voluntary approaches don’t work when it comes to pollution.”

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Costs of Medical Practice

— but Should they “Practice” More?[from my friend Daniel, who is a lawyer, not a Doctor, or, gracias a Dios, a statistician]INTERESTING STATISTICS! Doctors(A) The number of physicians in the U.S. is 700,000.(B) Accidental deaths caused by Physicians per year are 120,000.(C) Accidental deaths per physician is 0.171.Statistics courtesy of U.S.Dept of Health & Human Services. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Now think about this: Guns(A) The number of gun owners in the U.S is 80,000,000.(Yes, that’s 80 million)(B) The number of accidental gun deaths per year, all age groups,is 1,500.(C) The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is .000188.Statistics courtesy of FBI >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So, statistically, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous than gun owners.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Remember, ‘Guns don’t kill people, doctors do.’>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FACT: NOT EVERYONE HAS A GUN, BUT ALMOST EVERYONE HAS AT LEAST ONE DOCTOR.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;>>>>>Please alert your friends to this alarming threat.We must ban doctors before this gets completely out of hand!!!!!>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Out of concern for the public at large, I withheld the statistics on lawyersfor fear the shock would cause people to panic and seek medical attention.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Rundy Hamblen, age 80+, in her Jet ski on the Chesapeake . .

Media_httpfarm4static_gavlm

This is definitely the kind of photo I want to have in my obituary — assuming it’s publishable in a family newspaper (assuming, I guess that there still are newspapers, too).

From the Post’s obituary at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/01/AR2008030101706_2.html

With her oxygen tubes coiled around the handlebars, she skimmed over choppy waters, throttle wide open.

Bless Rundy Hamblen. . . .

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment